Telangana High Court
CRLP/10913/2009 of Shaik Nazeer Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.10913 OF 2009 Between: Shaik Nazeer, S/o. Sondu Miya ..... Petitioner – Accused No.1 AND The State of A.P.,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10913 OF 2009
Between:
Shaik Nazeer, S/o. Sondu Miya ..... Petitioner – AccusedNo.1
AND
The State of A.P.,through the Station House Officer,Kodad Town Police Station,Nalgonda District, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad .....Respondent HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10913 OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner Shaik Nazeer, accused No.1, seeking a direction to thelearned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kodad, Nalgonda Disrict togrant interim custody of the auto bearing registration No.AP24-X-1412seized in connection with Crime No.259 of 2009 of Kodad TownPolice Station, Nalgonda District, registered for the offences under Sections 366-A & 354 read with 34 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. The allegations against the petitioner are very serious innature. The petitioner with the help of two other accused kidnapped aminor girl in his auto bearing registration No.AP24-X-1412, took her tohis house and attempted to rape her; which ultimately constituted theoffences under Sections 366-A and 354 read with 34 IPC.
4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was granted bail on the very next day, which, in thecircumstances of the case, was not proper.
5. Considering the circumstances and the fact that the vehiclein crime is involved in very serious offences, it is not a fit case, wherethe vehicle can be released. Hence, I see no ground to entertain thispetition.
6. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at theadmission stage itself.
__________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J
December 29, 2009.
PV