Telangana High Court
WP/19127/2002 of Smt. Ghousia Begum Vs The Regional Manager on 29 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 19127 of 2002 BETWEEN: Smt. Ghousia Begum W/o.Late Abdul Gafoor, R/o.19-3-1089/ A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION No: 19127 of 2002
BETWEEN:
Smt. Ghousia Begum W/o.Late Abdul Gafoor, R/o.19-3-1089/A/72
Madina Colony, Jahanuma, Hyderabad.
... PETITIONER
AND
The Regional Manager [HCR]JBS., Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation A.P.S.R.T.C., Picket, Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature ofmandamus, declaring the proceedings bearing No.L4/785/[40]/02-HCR dated5-9-2002 of the respondent herein, in not appointing the petitioner asconductor under Bread Winner Scheme, as being illegal, arbitrary andmalafide, and further direct the respondent herein to appoint the petitioner asConductor, forthwith; and pass such further or other orders as this Hon’bleCourt may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. SYED SHAREEF AHMED
Counsel for the Respondent: K.MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR APSRTC)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantial relief:
“the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, declaring theproceedings bearing No.L4/785/[40]/02-HCR dated 05.09.2002 of the respondent herein, in not appointing the petitioneras conductor under Bread Winner Scheme, as being illegal, arbitraryand malafide, and further direct the respondent herein to appoint thepetitioner as Conductor, forthwith; and pass such further or otherorders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in thecircumstances of the case.”
2. At the hearing, Sri M. Mehdi Hussain, learned counsel representingMr. Syed Shareef Ahmed, requested the Court to permit the petitioner towithdraw the writ petition in terms of the letter dated 26.12.2008 filed by thelearned counsel in the Registry.
The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition isaccordingly dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J