Telangana High Court
WP/5594/2011 of Indireddy Subbamma Vs The State of A.P., on 31 December 2013
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.5544, 5548, 5579, 5593 and 5594 of 2011 Date:31.12.2013 COMMON ORDER: These Writ Petitions are filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION Nos.5544, 5548, 5579, 5593 and 5594
of 2011
Date:31.12.2013
COMMON ORDER:
These Writ Petitions are filed for the followingsubstantive relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly,one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring theimpugned action of respondent No.2 in remanding theappeal in Ref. No. D.Dis.No.E/689/2010, dated07.05.2010, respondent No.3 to adjudicate the matterafresh is illegal, void ab initio and contrary to Article300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary tothe provisions of Section 3 & 4 of the Andhra PradeshAssigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977.”
A common letter, dated 26.12.2013, has beenaddressed by Sri M.Jayaram Reddy, the learnedcounsel for the petitioners, to the Registrar (Judicial) inall these Writ Petitions, wherein it has been stated thathis clients have instructed him to withdraw the WritPetitions in view of the changed circumstances.
In view of the same, all these Writ Petitions aredismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petitions,W.P.M.P.Nos.6889, 6893, 6927, 6953 and 6954 of2011 are dismissed as infructuous.
__________________________
JUSTICE
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
31[st] December, 2013DR
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…