Telangana High Court
WP/40438/2014 of A.Mallikarjun, Vs The State of Telangana, on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.40438 of 2014 DATE: 30.12.2014 Between: A.Mallikarjun …Petitioner and The State of Telangana and others …Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI G.L.NARASIMHA RAO COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS : AGP FOR IRRIGATION AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.40438of2014DATE: 30.12.2014Between:A.Mallikarjun…Petitioner andThe State of Telangana and others…Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI G.L.NARASIMHA RAOCOUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS : AGP FOR IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT(TG)
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.40438of2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed with the grievance that respondents 4and 5 have not been cooperating with the petitioner by giving markingof the work relating to the irrigation tank required to be executed underagreement, dated 20.10.2014.
At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader forIrrigation and Command Area Development (Telangana State) oninstructions submitted that in response to the petitioner’srepresentation, dated 23.12.2014, respondent No.4 has visited thework site on 24.12.2014 and given proper markings to enable thepetitioner to carry on the balance work. He has further submitted that ifthe petitioner has any further grievance in this regard, he can approachrespondent No.4 in future and that as and when he approaches,respondent No.4 would do the needful to enable him to complete theexecution of work.
The above mentioned submissions of the learned AssistantGovernment Pleader are placed on record and the Writ Petition isaccordingly disposed of.
As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.50712 of2014 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of asinfructuous.
30[th] DECEMBER, 2014.
kvni
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J