Telangana High Court
WP/24239/2020 of Sudhanaboina Renuka Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others on 30 December 2020
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY , THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Betwee n: Sudhanaboina Renuka, Wife of
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA [AT ][HYDERABAD](Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 24239 OF 2020
Betwee n:
Sudhanaboina Renuka, Wife of Sudhanaboina Venkatesh, Aged about 28 [years,]Occ. Housewife, Resident of H.No.8-61, S.C.Colony, Narsimhapuram, [l\,4unagala]Mandal, Akupamula, Nalgonda 508 233.
...PETITIONER
AND
1The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary [to ][Government,]General Administration [(SPL (Law ]and Order) Department, [Secretariat ][Buildings,]Hyderabad.
2The Director General of Police, State of Telangana, [Hyderabad.]
3The Commissioner of Police, Khammarn, Khammam [District.]
4The Station House Officer, lll Town Police Station, [Khammam, ][Khammam]District.District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of [lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, [the ][High ][Court ][may be pleased ][to]issue a Writ, order or direction, more [particularly one ][in ][the ][nature of Writ ][of ][Habeas]Corpus, directing the 4th respondent to [produce ][the ][detenue ][who ][is ][the ][husband of]the petitioner by name Sudhanaboina [Venkatesh, ][aged about 32 years' ][resident ][of]H.No.B- 61, Narsimhapuram, Munagala [lt4andal, ][Akupamula and ][set ][him at liberty]
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. J P SRIKANTH
Counsel for the Respondents: THE [ADVOCATE GENERAL]
The Court made the following:
I!-dglffs.t{:
(per I l,,n'l,le I hc [(lhicl ]J u.rrct Sri Ilaghr codra Singh t)l,rulr.rrr; Nlr. f .I']. Srikanth, thc lcar:ncd c()unscl for thc i)ctiti()ncr, sLlbmirsthat the present wrir pcrioon has bccornc infructuous.
Therc[ore, this rvrit pctrdon is dismissed as infructuous. ['l'hcrc]shall be no ordcr as to costs.
r\s a sequel, Miscellaneous Pctitions, pcnclinu if lnv, stanclrlisposcrl t;f SD/.K.AMMAJIASSISTANT REGISTRSECTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY//
To,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. One CC to Sri. J. P. Srikanth, Advocate IOPUC]
IOPUC]2. fwo CCs to the Advocate General, High Court for the State [of ][Telangana. ][(OUT)]3. Two CD Copies.\-\ \ ^\y D{\ /
HIGH COURTDATED:301'1212020
ORDERWP.No.24239 of 2020
Dismissing the WPAs infructuousWithout costs.@[\\>]1)
1[uE ][Sr4]oo06 JAN [2021]i*
I