Telangana High Court
WP/18408/2003 of M/s Sri Venkata Subramanyeswara Modern Raw AND Boiled Vs The Commercial Tax Officer., on 4 December 2003
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THREE : PRESENT: THE HON`BLE DR. JUSTICE: MOTILAL B. NAIK AND THE HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE: DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM W.P. No. 18408 of 2003 Between: M/s. Sri Venkata
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
TUESDAY THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND THREE: PRESENT:THE HON`BLE DR. JUSTICE: MOTILAL B. NAIKAND
THE HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE: DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM
Between:
W.P. No. 18408 of 2003
M/s. Sri Venkata Subramanyeswara Modern Raw & Boiled Rice Mill,Velangi-533260, East Godavari District, rep. by its Partner, Mr. Ch.S.S.R.K.Chowdary.
Petitioner
AND
1. The Commercial Tax Officer, Jagannaikpur Circle, Kakinada, East Godavari District. Kakinada, East Godavari District.
2. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU, Kakinada Division, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
3. The Intelligence Officer, No. IV, O/o. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Kollam, Kerala State.
Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein, the High Court will bepleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order ordirection declaring the impugned notices of the 2[nd] respondent dated: 20-02-2003 & 19-06-2003 for the assessment years 2001-02 & 2002-03 proposingto levy CST as illegal and without jurisdiction and in conflict with the noticesof the 3[rd] respondent issued under the Kerala General Sales Tax act andinterdict the 2[nd] respondent from proceeding with the assessment pursuant tothe said notices.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and theaffidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court dated. 23-10-2003 & 28-10-2003 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.P. Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the G.P. for CommercialTaxes, for the Respondents.
The Court made the following ORDER:
“ Let this matter come up under the same caption next week. Theinterim order granted earlier shall extend until further orders. ”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Commercial Tax Officer, Jagannaikpur Circle, Kakinada, East Godavari District. Kakinada, East Godavari District.
2. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU, Kakinada Division, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
3. The Intelligence Officer, No. IV, O/o. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Kollam, Kerala State.
4. Two CCs to the G.P. for Commercial Taxes, High Court of A.P.,Hyd(OUT)Hyd(OUT)
5. Two spare copies.
USR.
HIGH COURT
DR MBNJ&
DSMJ
DATE: 04-11-2003
Note : :Let this matter come up under
the same caption next week.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Extending the Interim Order until further orders.