Telangana High Court

WP/3386/2022 of Nagarapu Bhagya Laxmi Vs The District Educational Officer and 3 Others on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 3386 OF 2022 Between: Nagarapu Bhagya Laxmi, Wo Y.Janardan, Aged about

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

WRIT PETITION NO: 3386 OF 2022

Between:

Nagarapu Bhagya Laxmi, Wo Y.Janardan, Aged about 42 [years, ]SchoolAs5t.(English) Z.P.H.School, Mamidipally, Nandigama Mandal, Rangareddy [Dist.](1D.No.1431433)

...PETITIONER

AND

'1 . The District Educational Officer, Rangareddy District.

2. The District Collector-cum-Chairman, Allocation Committee, Rangareddy [Dist.]

3. The Commissioner and Director of School [Education, ][Govt. ][of ][T.S. ][at]Hyderabad.Hyderabad.

4. The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, School [Education]Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of [lndia ][praying ][that in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed [therewith, ]the [High Court may ][be]pleased to issue a Writ Order or Orders, more particularly in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declare the impugned [Proc.No.ES/SC/RANG/SEAAS/O070]dt.O6tO1l2O22 issued by the 1st respondent [posting ][the ][petitioner ][at ][Z.P.H.S.]Mamidipally of Nandigama Mandal while [posting ][juniors or less ][meritorious ][in ][the]places opted by her though her spouse is working as Gr.l Hostel Welfare Officerby overlooking her merit and seniority in the [cadre ][of ][School ][Assistant ][even while]including the candidate who came on inter-district [in the ][year 2005 have ][been]placed above me and posted is clearly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and set aside thesame, and consequently hold that the [petitioner ][is ][entitled ]to [be ][posted ][in ][her]

opted [places ]including existing [vacancies ][nearer ]to [her ][spouse ][with ][all]consequential benefits.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances [stated ][in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ][the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased ][to]direct the respondents to consider the of the [petitioner ]appeal [dt.2611212021 ][fot]posting at nearby places under spouse category working.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.RAMGOPAL [RAO]

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

trIRIT PETITION No. 3386 of 2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned GovernmentPleader for Services-I has placed on record a copy of the [proceedings ][in]Memo No.Spl/Secretary Peshil2O2l-251, dated 31.O3.2022, [and]submitted that in compliance of the interim order [passed ]by this [Court,]the respondents have disposed of the appeal hled by the [petitioner ][duly]rejecting her case.

2l Recording the above made submission, the Writ Petition is disposedof granting liberty to challenge the proceedings in Memo No.Spl/SecretaryPeshi/2021-251, dated 31.O3.2022, if the [petitioner ]is so advised.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Nocosts.ASs,sriRfri+YrAf[fF//TRUE COPY// \,/

ASs,sriRfri+YrAf[fF\,/SECTIOIT OFFICER

To,

1. The District Educational Officer, Ranqareddv District.2.The District collector-cum-chairmanlAllocaiion committee. Ranoareddv Dist.2.The District collector-cum-chairmanlAllocaiion committee. Ranoareddv Dist.3.The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Covt] ot- iS. atHyderabad.Hyderabad.4.The Principal .Secretary, School Education Dept., Secretariat, State ofI elangana, Hyderabad.I elangana, Hyderabad.5.One CC to SRI M.RAMGOPAL RAO, Advocate. IOPUCI6.Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court ior the'State of Telangana atHyderabad. [OUT]Hyderabad. [OUT]7.Two CD Copies.\\y'\\y'

4.

5.6.

7. BSKSB

l

I

i

I

I

I

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911212023

ORDER

WP.No.3386 of 2022

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS

1tlestAt6(Joo2 [2 ][JAII]202[a-L**t'aPA1c

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead