Telangana High Court
WP/29041/2019 of Sri.T.Kishan Singh Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.29041 AND 29043 OF 2019 Date:30.12.2019 W.P.No.29041 of 2019 Between: Sri T. Kishan Singh, S/o. Sri T. Prem Singh, aged 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o.15-1-419, Feel Khan, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad .. Petitioner And The State of Telangana, rep., by
WRIT PETITION No.29041 AND 29043 OF 2019
Date:30.12.2019
W.P.No.29041 of 2019
Between:
Sri T. Kishan Singh, S/o. Sri T. Prem Singh, aged 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o.15-1-419, Feel Khan, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad
.. Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.29041 AND 29043 OF 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 5 and learned Government Pleader for Home for respondent No.6.
2. These writ petitions are instituted challenging the order of the Tahsildar, Nampally Mandal, Hyderabad, dated 19.12.2019, passed under Section 6 of the Telangana Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for short, ‘the Act, 1905’).
3. According to learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, in response to the notice issued under Section 7 of the Act, 1905, detailed explanations were offered by the petitioners on the status of the land and on various aspects. Without regard to the objections filed, summarily orders were passed holding that the petitioners are in illegal encroachment of the Government land and ordered for eviction.
4. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that though remedy of appeal under the Act, 1905 is available to the petitioners and the appeal can be filed within 30 days, the premises was immediately locked by the authorities.
5. From the reading of the orders impugned in the writ petitions and the objections filed by the petitioners, it is apparent that detailed explanations filed by the petitioners were not considered before the decision was taken holding that the petitioners are in unauthorized occupation of the premises.
6. Having regard to the same, learned counsel on either side agree for remanding the matters to the Tahsildar for taking a fresh view of the matters on due consideration of the explanations offered by the petitioners.
7. The Writ Petitions are accordingly allowed and the matters are remanded to the Tahsildar, Nampally Mandal, Hyderabad, for consideration of the issue afresh. The Tahsidlar is directed to examine the explanations offered by the petitioners by assigning due reasons for each of the objections filed by them and pass orders and communicate the decision to the petitioners.
Pending consideration of the issue by the Tahsildar, the lock and key of the premises shall be opened and handed over to the petitioners. However, the petitioners are directed not to put to use the premises and undertake any development activity in the premises. Handing over of the premises is only for the purpose of maintaining the premises by the petitioners.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________
P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date:30.12.2019
Note:- Issue C.C. in two days. (B/o) KH