Telangana High Court
WP/25123/2004 of C.S.Radha Poornima Vs DEfence Laboratory School on 31 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 25123 of 2004 Between: C.S.Radha Poornima W/o.Venkatesh hindu Defence laboratory School,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 25123 of 2004
Between:
C.S.Radha Poornima W/o.Venkatesh hindu
Defence laboratory School, Kanchan Bagh,Hyderabad.
AND
..... PETITIONER
Defence Laboratory School, Kanchan Bagh, Hyderabad rep by its Principal
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamusdeclaring the impugned notice No.152/DISCPN/109/DLSK dt 22-9-2004 as illegal,malafide, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and consequentlydirect the respondent to follow section 60 of CPC at the time of deducting amounts toimplement the attachment orders issued by Civil court.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.GANDURI NAGESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent : MR.N.RAMAMOHANA RAO
The Court at the stage of admission, made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is totally devoid of merit. In pursuance of the order ofthe attachment of the court, respondent has been deducting theamounts. Though according to the petitioner, it is in violation ofSection 60 of the C.P.C., the respondent is bound to pay and followthe directions of the Court. In pursuance of the attachment orders,they cannot have any right so as to consider the representation of thepetitioner.
Hence, the writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is dismissedat the stage of admission.
___________
bsv
To
1. The Principal, Defence Laboratory School, Kanchan Bagh, Hyderabad2. 2 CD copies2. 2 CD copies