Telangana High Court
WP/26905/2005 of T.Nageswar Rao Vs The District Collector(CS), Nalgonda on 23 December 2005
MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 26905 of 2005 DATED: 23.12.2005 Between: T. Nageshwar Rao & others … Petitioners. AND The District Collector (CS), Nalgonda, & others. … Respondents ORDER:- The writ petition is filed to declare the orders, dated 05.12.2005,
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No: 26905 of 2005
DATED: 23.12.2005
Between:
T. Nageshwar Rao & others… Petitioners.ANDThe District Collector (CS), Nalgonda,& others .… Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The writ petition is filed to declare the orders, dated 05.12.2005, issued by the 3[rd]respondent in canceling the retail dealerships of the petitioners as illegal, arbitraryand violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the sameand further direct the respondent No.1 to consider the representation submitted bythe petitioners.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in view of the counterfiled by the respondents disputing the contention of the petitioners that the elevenshops of the petitioners are not the sanctioned shops prior to 25.04.1994, thepetitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a libertyto file an appeal before the appellate authority under clause 31 of A.P. PetroleumProducts (Licensing and Regulation of Supplies Order) 1980.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writpetition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file an appeal beforethe appellate authority.
However, it is made clear that any allocation of the kerosene quota in respect of thedealership of the petitioners to the nearest fair price shop dealers will be subject tothe orders that may be passed by the appellate authority.
ES
_________________________
23.12.2005