Telangana High Court
WP/26544/2006 of G. Babu Rao, Vs The Depot Manager, APSRTC, on 22 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 26544 of 2006 Dated: 22.12.2006 Between: G. Babu Rao, S/o David, aged about 37 years, Conductor (E.No.280533), APSRTC, Wanaparthy Bus Depot, Mahabubnagar District. .... PETITIONER AND The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Wanaparthy Bus Depot, Mahabubnagar
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
Writ Petition No. 26544 of 2006
Dated: 22.12.2006
Between:
G. Babu Rao, S/o David, aged about 37 years, Conductor(E.No.280533), APSRTC, Wanaparthy Bus Depot, MahabubnagarDistrict.
AND
.... PETITIONER
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Wanaparthy Bus Depot,Mahabubnagar District.
.....RESPONDENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
Writ Petition No. 26544 of 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
Questioning the proceedings, dated 21.02.2005, of therespondent-Depot Manager in removing the petitioner from service, thepresent writ petition is filed.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedStanding Counsel for the respondent-Corporation.
As against the order impugned in this writ petition, passed bythe respondent-Depot Manager, it is submitted by the learned StandingCounsel for the respondent-Corporation and admitted to by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, that an effective alternative remedy by way ofappeal is available before the Divisional Manager, and withoutavailing such remedy, the petitioner straight away approached thisCourt and filed the present writ petition.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with thefollowing directions:
The petitioner may avail the effective alternative remedy ofappeal available to him against the impugned order passed by therespondent-Depot Manager, before the Divisional Manager, and onfiling such appeal, the Divisional Manager shall consider the same andpass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. No costs.
_________________
N.V. RAMANA, J.