Telangana High Court
WP/36965/2024 of Saagi Bhaskar Rao Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2024
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSANE AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 36965 OF 2024 Between: Saagi Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Gopal Rao, Age. 73
[ [32961]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSANE AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 36965 OF 2024
Between:
Saagi Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Gopal Rao, Age. 73 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Presentlyresiding at FL 203E, NCL Godavari, Quthbullapur Town and Mandal, Medchal-tMalkajgiri District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1The State of Telangana, Rep by Principal Secretary of Revenue, Secretariat,Hyderabad, Telangana.Hyderabad, Telangana.
2The District Collector, Jagtial Collectorate, Jagtial Town and District- The Tahsildar, Raikal t\/andal, Jagtial District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia [praying ]thal in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue one in direction Writ of [t4andamus declaring the actions of theRespondent No. 2 and 3 nol processing the Petitioner's application for Pass BookData Correction vide Application No. 2400122037 dated 18-11-2024 [filed ]throughMeeseva pertains to Sy No. llruuull and 241151211 lo an extent [of ][Ac. ][0.15 ][gts,]0.28 gts situated at Uppumadugu village, Raikal [Mandal ][of Jagtial District and ][not]issued the New Pattadar Pass Book and [Title ][Deed ][to the ][Petitioner ][is ][illegal,]irregular and improper and violation of [principles ]of [natural ][justice ]and alsoviolative of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, consequently todirect the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to issue New Pattadar Pass Book in favour ofthe Petitioner by processing the Application No. 2400122037 dated 18-11-2024filed through Meeseva pertains to Sy No. 1/ruuu/1 and [241151211 ]to an extent of ;-".
Ac. 0.'l 5 gts, 0.28 gls situated at Uppumadugu village, Raikal I\,4andal of JagtialDistrict.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOOSA SHIVACHANDRA
Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUEThe Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BIIASKAR REDDY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
WRIT PETITION No.36965 of 2O24
It is stated that the petitioner is the owner andpossessor of the land admeasuring Ac.O. 15 gts., inSy.No. 1/au/ 1, Ac.S.OO gts., in Sy.No.24l 15/2/ I, situated atUppumadugu Village, Raikal Mandal, Jagtial District and therevenue authorities have mutated his name in the revenuerecords and also issued pattadar passbooks in his favour asper the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land andPattadar Passbooks Act, 1971(for short "the ROR Act, 1971")and the Rules made thereunder. The case of the petitioner isthat in the digital pattadar passbooks, the land to an extentof Ac.O. 15 gts., in Sy.No.1/a:l/ I is been missing and land toan extent of Ac.4.l2 gts., in Sy.No.24/ l5/2/1, is recordedinstead of Ac.5.OO gts., therefore, he made online applicationuide No.24OO722O37, dated 18.11.2024 requesting forpassbook data correction. The grievance of the petitioner isthat even after receiving the said application, the respondentauthorities are not considering the same. Hence, the presentwrit petition. .,/
---z
2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for therespective parties and with their consent this writ [pt;tition ]isdisposed of at the admission stage
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenueappearing for the respondents has not disputed altout thesubmission of the online application and it is stated that ifthe application submitted by the petitioner fulfils all [the]requirements, the respondent authorities n'ill consider thesame
4. In view of the above submissions, this Court, withoutgoing into merits of the case, deems it appropriate to disposeof the \,'rit petition directing the respondent authorities toexamine the online application uide No.24OO|22O3'7 , dated78.11.2024, submitted by the petitioner and if he fulltls allthe requirements mentioned in CCLA's circular No. 1 of 202 1,dated l5.Ol.2O2l and Circular No.1 of 2024, dated2A.O2.2O24 and if he is found otherwise eligible, they shallconsider the same and pass a reasoned order in accordancewith law and communicate the same to the petitioner, withina period of eight (O8) weeks from the date of receipt of theapplication.
\
5. With the above observations, this Writ Petition isdisposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, To, SD/. T. TIRUMALA [DEVI]ASSISTANT REGISTRARETION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
1. The Principal Secretary of Revenue, [Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of]Telangana, Telangana.Telangana, Telangana.
2. The District Collector, Jagtial [Collectorate, Jagtial Town ][and ][District']
3. The Tahsildar, Raikal lrlandal, [Jagtial ][District.]
4. One CC to SRI BOOSA SHIVACHANDRA, [Advocate. ]IOPUCI
5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, [High ][Court ][for the ][State of ][Telangana]lourllourl
6. Two CD Copies.
BSK
BSKGJP[\-k]
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212024
>\\c-\t(c'' (,:,.- t\)'\,:i. \1,ot)0 fi ii, 21t25 E+'_*Pa ril,.rtz'
ORDER
WP.No.36965 of 2024
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS