Telangana High Court
CCCA/260/2002 of SMT.PREMA Vs N.GOPINATH RAO on 31 December 2024
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO i 260 0F 2002 Appeal Under Section 19 of Family Court Act 1984 aggrieved by the Judgment and decree
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NOi 260 0F 2002
Appeal Under Section 19 of Family Court Act 1984 aggrieved by theJudgment and decree dated 15-12-2001 in O.S.No. 121 of 1997 on the file of theCourt of the Family Court Judge, City Civil Court, at HyderabadJudgment and decree dated 15-12-2001 in O.S.No. 121 of 1997 on the file of theCourt of the Family Court Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad Between:
Smt. Prema Wo. N. Gopinath Rao aged about 50 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o.(Temp) 3-4-196, Lingampally, Hyderabad.(Temp) 3-4-196, Lingampally, Hyderabad.
... Plaintiff / APPELLANT
AND
N. Gopinath Razo S/o. Not known to Petitioner, aged d3 years, Occ: Retd.Employee _ of ECIL, R.o. 12-1-508/39, Laxminagir Colony, Shantinagar,Lalaguda, Secudnerabad . DefendanURespondent- Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. SRINIVAS CHOWDARY (Died)
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI R. UMENDER KUMAR
The Court detivered the following Judgment:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is hled against the judgment anC decree dated15.12.2001 in O.S.No.121 of 1997 passed by the learned F'amilyCourt Judge, Ci[, Civil Court, at Hyderabad.
2. The sr,ut vide O.S.No.121 of 1997 u/as filed lormaintcnance b1, the rvife against her husband for clissolution ofmarriage, recovcry of articles and for maintenance. Thc trialCourt only granted permanent of Rs.75,OCrO/- towzrrdspermanent atimony and other three reliefs wr:re disntissedagainst which plaintiff in the suit preferred this apceal.
3. Learnec counsel for respondent present.4. It Ls ir lormed that Iearned counsel for he appellantpassed away on 08.12.2023 and the same was recordcd on28.t1 .2024.
5. As the irppcllant failed to take nccessary st()ps to pursuethe litigation cven after listing the matter under ttrr: caption lordismissal, no purpose is served in continuing the acpeal.
6. Accordirrgly C.C.C.A is dismissed for non-prosecution. t As a secucl, miscellaneous petitions, pending il any, shallsta nd t loscrl.sta nd t loscrl.
Sd,- K. [SRI]NIVASA [RAO]JOINTREGISTRARrl\lL-V SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE [COPY//]
i,l*tSr'5i,r'lhi-:uis3fl"ti'Jl?l'it.tJJ:lt3l3J.je"*"nrecords)
3. One [CC ][to ][SRl. ][R' ][UMENDER ][KUMAR' ][Advocate ][TOPUCI]
4Two CD [CoPitts]
YX
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:3111212024
JUDGMT]N'ICCCA.No.260 of [20O1t]
DISMISSINCi I.HL CC( ['\ ][ITOIL ][NON ][PROSIICIUTION]
G[..e(f,(A]W*
E [ST^I€]1a)9(znr il'\i\ ?[25Ct] ta.'.,,,\1 \\\--..or.r,..