Telangana High Court

WP/27949/2005 of M/s.Vikas Degree College, Station Road, Khammam Vs The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, on 30 December 2005

SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.NO.27949 OF 2005 Dt.30.12.2005 Between: Vikas Degree College, rep. by its Secretary and Correspondent, K.Venkateswarlu … Petitioner And The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Warangal and 2 others. …

W.P.NO.27949 OF 2005

Dt.30.12.2005

Between:

Vikas Degree College, rep. by its

Secretary and Correspondent,K.Venkateswarlu … Petitioner

And

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization,Warangal and 2 others. … Respondents

ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned SandingCounsel on behalf of the respondents.

The petitioner is the Secretary and Correspondent of the DegreeCollege. It is stated that the petitioner is paying contributions to theemployees under Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund andMiscellaneous provisions Act, 1952 (for short ‘the Act’). But there wasdelay in payment of the said contributions. Therefore, the firstrespondent issued the impugned proceedings dated 30.5.2005under Sections 7-Q and 14-B of the Act levying interest and damagesand the actual amount is to the tune of Rs.3,81,105/-. It is stated thatout of the said amount, the petitioner has paid an amount ofRs.83,569/- under various challans. It is stated that the college of thepetitioner is running in loss and therefore he seeks permission for paying the remaining amount in equal instalments.

I am not expressing any confirmation in respect of the saidamount paid by the petitioner is Rs.83,569/- or less. However, it is forthe first respondent to verify the payment of the said amount. Thepetitioner submits that he has no intention to challenge the impugnedorder in an appeal, but only requests permission for payment of thebalance amount in easy instalments in the interests of the institutionand staff.

Page 1 of 2

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, thepetitioner is permitted to pay the balance amount pursuant to theimpugned proceedings in 12 equal monthly instalments commencingfrom 10.1.2006. On payment of the first instalment by the petitioner,the first respondent is directed to revoke the prohibitory order dated29.6.2005.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

__________________

(V.ESWARAIAH, J.)

30.12.2005

kpr

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead