Telangana High Court
WP/20053/2005 of K. Radha Krishnaiah, (Died) Vs A.P. State Financial Corporation Ltd. on 30 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20053 of 2005 Date: 30.12.2010 Between: K. Radha Krishnaiah (died) per K. Ram Prasad ..... Petitioner AND The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation Limited and another .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A . Satyanarayana
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.20053 of 2005
Date: 30.12.2010
Between:K. Radha Krishnaiah (died)per K. Ram Prasad
AND
..... Petitioner
The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation Limited and another
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A. Satyanarayana Counsel for Respondents:Sri J. Parthasarathy, learned standing counsel for APSFCL
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“…to issue a Writ or Direction more particularly in thenature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of theRespondents Corporation in issuing the impugned noticedated 31.08.2005 in pursuance to the earlier notices dated04.08.2004, 20.10.2003 and 26.09.2003 to the Petitioner byinvoking the provisions of the A.P. Revenue Recovery Act isillegal, Arbitrary and the action of the 2[nd] Respondent seekingto enforce the alleged dues claimed in the impugned noticesdated 31.08.2005, 04.08.2004, 20.10.2003 and 26.09.2003 isillegal, arbitrary and barred by Law of Limitation andconsequently to set aside the said notices and to pass such other relief or reliefs..”
Sri A. Satyanarayana, the learned counsel for the petitioner,seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition interms of the letter dated 28.12.2010 addressed to the Registry.
The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner isaccepted.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order dated12.09.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.25511 of 2005 as extended on 03.03.2008is vacated, and W.P.M.P.No.25511 of 2005 and W.V.M.P.No.3071 of2005 are dismissed as infructuous.
________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
30[th] December, 2010GHN