Telangana High Court

CRP/6150/2010 of Anumulasetty Lakshmi Kameswari Vs A.Lalitha Jayasree on 31 December 2010

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6150 OF 2010 Between: A.Lakshmi Kameswari … Petitioner And A.Lalitha Jayasree and others … Respondents This

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE 31[st] DAY OF DECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND AND TEN

PRESENT

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6150 OF 2010

Between:A.Lakshmi Kameswari

And

… Petitioner

A.Lalitha Jayasree and others

… Respondents

This Court made the following:

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6150 OF 2010

ORDER: -

This revision under Article 227 of the constitution is filed to revisethe order of the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Fast Track Court,Vijayawada made in I.A.No.721 of 2006 in O.S.No.616 of 2000, dated20.02.2007, wherein the application filed for appointment of receiveras per orders in I.A.No.120 of 2006, dated 29.04.2006, for themanagement and securing the income out of the plaint scheduleproperty, has been allowed appointing an Advocate Commissioner asa Receiver for management of the plaint schedule property.

Page 1 of 2

Though the present revision petition is filed with an application to condone the delay in representing the C.R.P., in the year 2007, thepetitioner has not evinced any interest to see for obtaining anynecessary interim orders. In the process, the Receiver appointedthrough the impugned order took steps to collect the rents and the suithas now been transferred to the Court of III Additional Senior CivilJudge, Vijayawada and the same was numbered as O.S.No.1063 of2009 and the said case was posted for cross-examination of D.Ws.2 to4 on 23.01.2011. When the plaintiff’s evidence is already closed andthe suit is coming up for cross-examination of D.Ws.2 to 4, there is nonecessity to disturb the order, which is not in operation since morethan three years.

The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The trialCourt is directed to dispose of the suit within three months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as tocosts.

December 31, 2010lmv

__________________

A.GOPAL REDDY, J

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead