Telangana High Court

WP/13280/2011 of Rasha Shankar, Vs The Special Deputy Collector (T/W), on 30 December 2011

C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.13280 of 2011 Date : 30-12-2011 Between: Rasha Shankar, Mogad Dhagad, Kouthala Mandal, Adilabad District .. Petitioner And The Spoecial Deputy Collector (T/W), Adilabad HQRS Utnoor, Adilabad District and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri B. Yuvraj

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY

W.P.No.13280 of 2011

Date : 30-12-2011

Between:

Rasha Shankar,

Mogad Dhagad, Kouthala Mandal,Adilabad District ..Petitioner

And

The Spoecial Deputy Collector (T/W),

Adilabad HQRS Utnoor,Respondents

Adilabad District and others ..

Counsel for petitioner : Sri B. Yuvraj for Sri D. RaghavuluCounsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Assistant GovernmentPleader for Social Welfare Counsel for respondent No.3 : --Counsel for respondent No.4 : Sri Paturu MadhusudhanKumar

ORDER:

The grievance of the petitioner is that even thoughrespondent No.3 who is his brother, has sold the property torespondent No.4, who is allegedly a non-tribal, respondentNos.1 and 2 have not been taking any action for eviction ofrespondent No.4 on the petitioner’s representation dated 15-11-2010.

Even though notice before admission was issued asfar back as 29-4-2011, no counter-affidavit is filed by anyof the respondents.

Page 1 of 2

After hearing Sri B. Yuvraj, the learned counselrepresenting Sri D. Raghuvulu, learned counsel for thepetitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader forSocial Welfare and Sri Paturu Madhusudhan Kumar,learned counsel for respondent No.4, I am of the opinionthat as the petitioner’s grievance is innocuous, interests ofjustice would be met if respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directedto examine the grievance of the petitioner stated to havebeen ventilated in representation dated 15-11-2010and take action in accordance with the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land TransferRegulation 1 of 1959, as amended by Regulation No.1 of1970.

Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition isdisposed of.

As a sequel, WPMP No.16120/2011 is disposed of asinfructuous.

_________________________

Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy

Date : 30-12-2011AM

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead