Telangana High Court

WP/41029/2014 of M. Rafee S/o M.Imamappa Vs Union of India, Rep.byithe General Manager, on 31 December 2014

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS WRIT PETITION No.41029 OF 2014 ORDER:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu) This writ petition is filed challenging the order, dated 06.06.2014, in O.A.No.020/0234/2014 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANUANDTHE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS

WRIT PETITION No.41029 OF 2014

ORDER:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu)

This writ petition is filed challenging the order, dated 06.06.2014,in O.A.No.020/0234/2014 on the file of the Central AdministrativeTribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad (for short, “the Tribunal”).

2. The petitioner joined as Pharmacist-II in Guntakal Division ofSouth Central Railway during January, 1996 and was given promotionto the merged cadre of Pharmacist Grade-I during 2009. Whileworking at Kadapa since October, 2007, he submitted a requesttransfer application to respondent No.3 for transfer to Railway Hospital,Guntakal vide letter, dated 03.01.2014. Basing on the said requesttransfer application to respondent No.3, he was transferred fromKadapa to Guntakal by the competent authority on 29.01.2014. In themeanwhile, on 13.01.2014, the petitioner made an applicationwithdrawing the request transfer application, dated 03.01.2014, andthat has not been accepted.

3. Petitioner/applicant filed the aforementioned Original Applicationbefore the Tribunal to call for the records pertaining to Office OrderNo.SCR/P-HQ/121/MD/PHA/Vol.XII issued under letter, dated29.01.2014, and declare the action of respondent No.2 in transferringhim from Kadapa to Guntakal showing it as a request transfer andposting respondent No.5 in his place at Kadapa as illegal andarbitrary, and consequently, to set aside the same and quash the saidoffice order to the extent of the applicant and respondent No.5 isconcerned and direct respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein to retain theapplicant at Kadapa.

4 . The Tribunal, upon considering the material on record,dismissed the aforementioned Original Application. Challenging thesame, applicant filed the present writ petition.

5. Heard.

6. It cannot be said that without considering the letter of withdrawal,dated 13.01.2014, the request has been accepted by the competentauthority to transfer the petitioner from Kadapa to Guntakal. Hence,the Tribunal rightly passed the impugned order and that order needsno interference by this Court and the writ petition is liable to bedismissed.

7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be noorder as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this WritPetition shall stand closed.

______________________

JUSTICE K.C.BHANU

_______________

JUSTICE ANIS

Date: 31.12.2014

AMD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANUAND

THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS

WRIT PETITION No.41029 OF 2014

DATE: 31.12.2014

AMD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead