Telangana High Court
WRIT PETITION 594 of 2014 on 31 December 2013
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMARWRIT PETITION NO: 594 OF 2014
Between:
M. Murali Krishna Goud, S/o. M.Eshwaraiah [Goud, ][Aged ][about 46 years,]Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.2-1-20614, [NGO's Colony, ][Zaheerabad, ][Medak District.]
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, [Prohibition & Excise, Department,]Secretariat, Hyderabad.Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Prohibition [& Excise, ][Hyderabad.]
3. The Prohibition as Excise [Superintendent, ][Medak District.]
4. The District Collector, Medak District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of [the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in the [affidavit ][filed ][therewith, ][the ][High Court may ][be]pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any [other ][appropriate ][writ or ][direction]declaring the action of the [respondents ][in ][issuing Gazette ][notification ][No.7312013,]31 .12.2019 for [grant ]of licence [in respect of ][shop at serial ][No.32, ][Raikod Village]& Mandal, Medak District, as [illegal, ][arbitrary and ][contrary ][to the ][provisions ][of ][the]A.P Excise Act, and [pass]
A. NO:1 OF1PMP. NO: 657 OF 2014
Page 1 of 2
Petition under Section [151 ][CPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed [in ][support ][of the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased stay ][all]further [proceedings ]in [pursuance ][of ][the ][Gazette ][notification ][No.7312013,]31.12.2013 for [grant ][of ][licence ][in ][respect ][of Shop at ][serial ][No.32, ][Raikod Village]& Mandal, Medak District, [pending disposal ][of ][the ][W.P.]Counsel for the Petitioner: [SRI S.V. ][RAMANA ][FOR ][SRl. O. MANOHER ][REDDY]
Counsel for the Respondent [Nos.1 ][to ][3: ][GP FOR ][PROHIBITION ][& ][EXCISE]
Counsel for the Respondent [No.4: ][GP FOR REVENUE]
The Court made the following: [ORDER]
1'HE HONOUII.ABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][T'VINOD ][KTJMAR]
WITIT PE I'l'l'l[0NN][ o.59:l][ of ][201,1]
olll)l!l{:
subrt-t its its [[that ][thc]][[thc]]
subrt-t its its [[that ][thc]][[thc]]Sri S.V.Ramana, [learned counsel ][lor ][pettttoner]cause [in the ][Writ ][Petition ][does ][not ][require ][any ][more ][adjudication ][and ][this]Writ I'etition [has ][become ][inh'uctuous']
ltecording [thc ][same, ][this ][Writ ][Petition ][is dismisscd ][as ][infructuous']No costs.As a sequel, [the miscellaneous ][petitions' ][if ][any pending' shall ][stand]c los :d.
DDYSD/.P.PADMANABHAASSISTANT [REGI]SLSECT]ON [OFFICER]
//TRUE COPY//
"'l t?iH?J, state or or ?*: "B.e"r'.AB #TgLfl,ffSgi.t1::i4'f "" . +UtfSfooborll**"nue, [Hish ][court ][for ][the ][State ][or ][rerangana at]Hvderabad. [OUTI4. Tfro CD [Copies]5. One SPare [CoPY]CHRPS ,P\.-.--'
state or or [rerangana]
I
I
HIGH COURT
DATE D :2 210612022
ORDERW.P.No.594 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUGTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS
2. gTAT E ct),/1 €t\ctl Nr)D
@\A[!{-'-]
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…