Telangana High Court
WP/28415/2008 of Gunisetti Suryanarayanamma Vs Revenue Divisional Officer, on 29 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.28415 of 2008 Between: 1 Gunisetti Suryanarayanamma W/o.late Satyanarayana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULUWRIT PETITION No.28415 of 2008
Between:
1 Gunisetti Suryanarayanamma W/o.late Satyanarayana R/o.Komaragiripatnam, Allavaram Mandalam, East Godavari District.
2 Gunisetti Durga W/o.Lakshminarayana
R/o.Komaragiripatnam, Allavaram Mandalam, East Godavari District...... PETITIONERS ..... PETITIONERS
AND
1 Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, East Godavari District.
2 Tahsildar, Allavaram, East Godavari District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtmay be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction directing the respondents to consider theirrepresentation dated 22.8.2008, addressed to the 1[st] respondent toconsider their case for appointment as F.P. Shop dealer for F.P. ShopNo.19 of Komaragiri Village, Allavaram Mandalam, East GodavariDistrict.
Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.LAKSHMANA SARMA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULUWRIT PETITION No.28415 OF 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learnedGovernment Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents.
It appears, one G. Satyanarayana, who is the husband of the 1[st]petitioner and father-in-law of the 2[nd] petitioner, was the dealer of fairprice shop No.19 of Komaragiripatnam Village, Allavaram Mandal ofEast Godavari District. It is the case of the petitioners that the saidSatyanarayana died on 17.07.2008 and, since there is no otherlivelihood for them, the 1[st] petitioner submitted a representation to the1[st] respondent- Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, East GodavariDistrict, on 22.08.2008, requesting to appoint her daughter-in-law, the2[nd] petitioner herein, as dealer of the said fair price shop, but the saidrepresentation is not yet considered.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing anyopinion on merits, the 1[st] respondent- Revenue Divisional Officer,Amalapuram, East Godavari District, is directed to consider therepresentation dated 22.08.2008 purported to have been submitted bythe petitioners and pass appropriate orders as per law within a period offour weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners.
With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
29[th] December, 2008IBL
__________________
JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU