Telangana High Court
CRP/295/2016 of E.Srinivas, Vs Shravan Badruka on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,TI IE THIR'ry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER IWO TI IOUSAND AND TWENry ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 295 OF 20'16 Between: P.91t1"yL,- S/S Mallaiah, Aged 55 years, Occ:Business in premises No.15-
HICH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,TI IE THIR'ry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERIWO TI IOUSAND AND TWENry ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 295 OF 20'16
Petition under Sec.22 of AP Building(Leave,Rent,Eurction) ControlAct, ["1960, ]aggrievecl against the Judgement passed in RA No. 172 of 201,4dated: 26.1.0.2015 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City SmallAct, ["1960, ]aggrievecl against the Judgement passed in RA No. 172 of 201,4dated: 26.1.0.2015 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City SmallCauses Court at Hyderabad, Preferred against the Order dt: Zg/3/14 r\RC 177 /10 on the file of V Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad.RC 177 /10 on the file of V Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad.
Between:
P.91t1"yL,- [S/S ][Mallaiah, ][Aged ][55 ][years, ][Occ:Business ][in ][premises No.15-]9483, Mehboobgunj Hyderabad
...REVISTON yETTTTONETVRESpONDENT
AND
1. Shravan Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, Age 42 years, Occ:Business,Business, 2Shyanr Badruka,, S/o. Mtrkr-rndlal Badruka, Aged 41 years, Occ:Business, Both resitltnts of IJ.lr-o.8-2-686 /9 /9 & 10, Roa c-l No. j 2,Banjara l-lills, FIvd era ba d.Business, Both resitltnts of IJ.lr-o.8-2-686 /9 /9 & 10, Roa c-l No. j 2,Banjara l-lills, FIvd era ba d.
...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS
I.A. NO:1 OF 2016(CRP MP. NO:364 OF 2016)
Petition under Section that in the circumstarrces151 CPC ;rrayirrg 151 CPC ;rrayirrg stated in the affidavit filed in support of tl-re petition, the High Court maybe pleased to suspend the orrler ;rassed in RA No.1Z2 of 2014 datecl:26.70,20-15 passed by the Aclditional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Courr,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRL DAMODAR MUNDRA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R A ACHUTHANAND
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON' ILE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMAI.,AT]|{A
CtVI , REVISION PETII'ION NO.2q 5 (]F 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned ( )unsel for the petitioner submits that the matterhas been settl d between the parties and, therefore., the CivilRevision Petitior may be dismissed.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as in ructuous.
There st all be no order as to costs. Miscellaneousapplications, if my, pending shall stand dismissed.
I
HIGH COL RT
DATED:3U tU2021,
/4,rE [rtArr{](q1lliJ,J15 FEB20U ['f,]\\- [i) ][t ][r,r.;Ia'][ .{.]
ORDERCRP.No.29i of 201,6
CIVIL RE'/ISION PETITION IS DISN{ISSED ASINFRUCT JOUS
c40II