Telangana High Court
WP/7620/1997 of R.G. Sankla Vs Reserve Bank of India on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7620 of 1997 Between: R.G. Sankla (Transport Contractor), a Proprietary concern,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANAWRIT PETITION NO : 7620 of 1997
Between:
R.G. Sankla (Transport Contractor),a Proprietary concern,having its Office at D.No. 11-6-380/19, Nampaly, Hyderabad, rep. by its Prop. Mr. Kamal Kishore Sankla S/O R.G.Sankla, R/o 5-1-698, Amrut Nagar Colony, Troop Bazar, Hyderabad
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Reserve Bank of India, Saifabad, Hyderabad, rep. by Chief General Manager.
2 Mr. Mohd. Saleem
R/o 13-6-434/A/163, Guddimalkapur, Hyderabad-28.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue any appropriate Writ especially one in the nature of Mandamus declaring theaction of 1st respondent in rejecting the Tender of the Petitioner and awarding theTransport Contract to 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unjust andconsequently to direct the Ist respondent to allot the Transport/Labour Contract to thePetitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.Shivkumar Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR. K. SRINIVASA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Ms.G.Sudha The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
In view of the letter filed and also in the light of the averments made in the affidavitfiled in support of the writ petition and the relief prayed for in the writ petition, the writpetition became infrunctuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition shall stand dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
______________
P.S.NARAYANA, J
Dated : 29[th] December, 2004.
sh
To
1 The Chief General Manager, Reserve Bank of India Saifabad, Hyderabad2. 2CD copies.