Telangana High Court
WP/27855/2005 of APSRTC, rep. by its Regional Manager, Vs Sri Lachaiah, on 28 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.27855 OF 2005 Dated 28.12.2005 Between: A.P.S.R.T.C.,rep by its Regional manager, Nalgonda District. … petitioners and 1. Sri Lachaiah, s/o.R.Ramachandraiah. 2. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-III, Hyd. … Respondents. THE
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.27855 OF 2005
Dated 28.12.2005
Between:
A.P.S.R.T.C.,rep by its Regional manager, Nalgonda District.
… petitioners
and
1. Sri Lachaiah, s/o.R.Ramachandraiah.
2. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-III, Hyd. … Respondents.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.27855 OF 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed against the order of the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad, dated15.12.2004 in M.P.No.13 of 2001. The first respondent filed the application beforethe Labour Court under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act claimingvarious reliefs consequent upon his retirement. Through the order under challenge,the Labour Court awarded a sum of Rs.19,313/- towards encashment of 95 days ofEarned Leave.
Though the learned counsel for the petitioner had urged several grounds, this Courtis not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the Labour Court. Extensive discussion was undertaken in relation to each and every item and the Labour Courtfurnished cogent reasons in support of the relief granted by it to the petitionertherein. Relevant provisions of the service regulations were indicated and as againstthe claim of the first respondent for 130 days, the Labour Court granted the leave for95 days. The petitioners are not able to point out any factual or legal error in theorder.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. Petitioners are granted two months timefrom today for depositing the amount ordered by the Labour Court.
___________
28.12.2005
mdaa.