Telangana High Court

WP/37873/2013 of The District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. Vs The Government of A.P. on 31 December 2013

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.37873 of 2013 Between: The District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. .. Petitioner AND The Govt. of Andhra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWOTHOUSAND AND THIRTEEN

Present

Between:

The District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd.

.. Petitioner

AND

The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its Principal Secretary &Public Enterprises Department and Chairperson, Implementation Secretariat, Secretariat, Hyderabad & 6 others

.. Respondents

The Court made the following:

Page 1 of 2

ORDER:

The petitioner is a District Co-operative MarketingSociety Limited. The averment of the petitioner is that theSociety has undertaken business of cotton bales in the year1997-98 with the 5[th] respondent. The total sale amount wasRs.1,34,18,755/-, out of which the 5[th] respondent paid onlyRs.84,63,215/- and there is a balance of Rs.49,55,540/-. On theissue of payment of the balance amount, severalrepresentations have been made by the petitioner to variousauthorities. On the last occasion, a representation is submittedto the Principal Secretary & Public Enterprises Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad (1[st] respondent) on 30.03.2013. The 1[st]respondent, as per his letter, dated 27.04.2013, stated that thesaid representation was forwarded to the Industries andCommerce Department (2[nd] respondent). Accordingly, thepetitioner filed further representation on 06.07.2013 to thesecond respondent bringing to the notice the reply given by thePublic Enterprises Department (1[st] respondent) and requested to take action of ensuring that the amount due to the petitioner is recovered and paid.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far noorders are passed on the said representation pending with theIndustries and Commerce Department (2[nd] respondent) andrequests disposal of the writ petition with a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to pass orders on the representation submittedby the petitioner as referred to by the first respondent.

3. Having regard to the submissions made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion onmerits, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the secondrespondent to take a decision and pass orders on the requestmade by the petitioner for payment of amount due on account ofsale of cotton bales to the 5[th] respondent and pass orderswithin a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copyof this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petition, if any, pending in this writ petition, shallstand closed.

_________________

P.NAVEEN RAO, J

Date: 31[st] December, 2013

KL

KL

Date: 31[st] December, 2013

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead