Telangana High Court
WP/3926/1996 of Muthyala Srinivasa Rao Vs Mandal Revenue OFficer on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3926 of 1996 Between: Muthyala Srinivasa Rao S/o. Chandraiah Waddigudem V.R.Puram
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 3926 of 1996
Between:
Muthyala Srinivasa Rao S/o. Chandraiah Waddigudem V.R.Puram Mandal Khammam Dist
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 Mandal Revenue OFficer V.R.Puram
Khammam Dist
2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam Khammam Dist 3 Director of Settlements Gaganvihar Opp:Gandhi Bhavan Hyderabad
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate writ order or direction:- a) to declare the Memo No.G1/5084/95(L.Dis) Dt.12/1/1996 issued by the director of Settlements A.P., Hyderabad is illegaland contrary to the provisions of the Regulation 2 of 1970 b) to quash the noticesRc.No.B/385/85, Dt.30/11/1995 and Rc.No.B/1126/95, Dt.5/12/95 issued by theMRO, V.R.Puram, Khammam Dist are without jurisdiction and contrary to theRegulation 2 of 1970. c) To direct the respondents not to disturb the petitioner fromthe land in Sy.No.251/4 extent of H.2.04 aires, Waddigudem village, V.R.PuramMandal, Khammam Dist d) To direct the respondents to complete the enquiry underregulation 2 of 1970 in respect of the Sy.No.251/4, extent of H.2.05 Waddigudemvillage, V.R.Puram Mandal, Khammam Dist.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.KAMESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following :
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.3926 OF 1996
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter in thewrit petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having becomeinfructuous.
mdaa.
27.12.2004.
1 Mandal Revenue OFficer V.R.Puram
Khammam Dist
2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam Khammam Dist 3 Director of Settlements Gaganvihar Opp:Gandhi Bhavan Hyderabad
4. Two C.Cs to G.P.for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT)
5. Two C.D.copies.