Telangana High Court

WP/3926/1996 of Muthyala Srinivasa Rao Vs Mandal Revenue OFficer on 27 December 2004

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3926 of 1996 Between: Muthyala Srinivasa Rao S/o. Chandraiah Waddigudem V.R.Puram

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO : 3926 of 1996

Between:

Muthyala Srinivasa Rao S/o. Chandraiah Waddigudem V.R.Puram Mandal Khammam Dist

AND

..... PETITIONER

1 Mandal Revenue OFficer V.R.Puram

Khammam Dist

2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam Khammam Dist 3 Director of Settlements Gaganvihar Opp:Gandhi Bhavan Hyderabad

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate writ order or direction:- a) to declare the Memo No.G1/5084/95(L.Dis) Dt.12/1/1996 issued by the director of Settlements A.P., Hyderabad is illegaland contrary to the provisions of the Regulation 2 of 1970 b) to quash the noticesRc.No.B/385/85, Dt.30/11/1995 and Rc.No.B/1126/95, Dt.5/12/95 issued by theMRO, V.R.Puram, Khammam Dist are without jurisdiction and contrary to theRegulation 2 of 1970. c) To direct the respondents not to disturb the petitioner fromthe land in Sy.No.251/4 extent of H.2.04 aires, Waddigudem village, V.R.PuramMandal, Khammam Dist d) To direct the respondents to complete the enquiry underregulation 2 of 1970 in respect of the Sy.No.251/4, extent of H.2.05 Waddigudemvillage, V.R.Puram Mandal, Khammam Dist.

Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.KAMESWAR RAO

Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following :

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO.3926 OF 1996

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter in thewrit petition has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having becomeinfructuous.

mdaa.

27.12.2004.

1 Mandal Revenue OFficer V.R.Puram

Khammam Dist

2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam Khammam Dist 3 Director of Settlements Gaganvihar Opp:Gandhi Bhavan Hyderabad

4. Two C.Cs to G.P.for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT)

5. Two C.D.copies.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead