Telangana High Court
CRLRC/3121/2015 of Seema Vazirani, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2015
SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3121 of 2015 ORDER: The petitioner preferred the present Criminal Revision Case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the order dated 09.11.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.561 of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
ORDER:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGOCRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3121 of 2015
The petitioner preferred the present Criminal Revision Case byinvoking the provisions under Sections 397 & 401 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure being aggrieved by the order dated 09.11.2015passed in Crl.M.P.No.561 of 2015 in C.C.No.48 of 2010 by the II-Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Visakhapatnam, wherein andwhereby the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the discharge petitionfiled by petitioner.
Heard and perused the material available on record.
After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for petitionerwhile not pressing for the main prayer, confined his arguments only tothe extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before thetrial Court.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thepresence of the petitioner is dispensed with before the Courtconcerned, except on the dates on which the trial Judge insists for herappearance.
Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions filed in this revision, if any, shall stand closed.
December 30, 2015 KTL
_______________
RAJA ELANGO, J