Telangana High Court

WP/28913/2019 of Mohammed Majeed Khan Vs The State of Telangana And 5 Others on 30 December 2019

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.28913 of 2019 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.5 and 6 in sending the constables to the petitioner’s property/plot and threatening to vacate and surrender the possession of the

WRI T PETI TI ON No.28913 of 2019

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R:

This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.5 and 6 in sending the constables to the petitioner’s property/plot and threatening to vacate and surrender the possession of the petitioner’s plot No.A 383 in Survey No.165 Part situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and causing interference in the civil matters/disputes without any authority or jurisdiction, as being illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, dated 27.12.2019, a copy of which is placed on the record of this Court, denied the allegation of the petitioner that respondents 5 and 6 sent constables to petitioner’s land and threatened him to vacate and surrender possession of the land. It is also submitted that respondents 5 and 6 are only discharging their legitimate duties and did not harass, threaten or interfere in the civil disputes in any manner, nor did they interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station, at any point of time.

4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader stating that the authorities only performed their legitimate duties and did not interfere in the civil dispute of the petitioner in any manner, no further orders need be passed in the present writ petition.

5. The writ petition is accordingly closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.

_____________________

JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR

Date:30.12.2019

GJ

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead