Telangana High Court
WP/4320/2012 of Maloth Chandu Vs The Tahsildar, on 31 December 2024
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR MalothChandu,s/oLokya,aged28years,Occ:Agriculture'Fyo'VinobhaNagar' Julurpadu Mandal, Khammam District. PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,
[ [33021]
HIGH COURT FOR [THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE [THIRTY ][FIRST ][DAY ][OF ][DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY FOUR]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE K, SARATH]
WRIT PETI[TION ][NO:43][20 ][0F ][2012]
Between:
MalothChandu,s/oLokya,aged28years,Occ:Agriculture'Fyo'VinobhaNagar'Julurpadu [Mandal, Khammam ][District.]
.....PETITIONER
AND
1. The Tahsildar, [Julurpadu Mandal, Khammam District']
2. The Revenue [Divisional ][Officer' ][Kothagudem'J(hammam District']
/
3. The District [Collector, Khammam, Khammar6 District']
4. The Project [Officer, l.T.D.A., Bhadrachalam, Khammam District']
5. Station House [Officer, Julurpadu Police Station' Khammam District']
.....RESPONDENTSPetition Under [Article ][226 ][of ][the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]abecircumstances [stated ][in the ][affidavit ][filed ][therewith' ][the ][High Court ][m]one lnpleased to issue any [appropriate ][Writ, ][Order ][or ][direction more ][p][articularl]dents notthe nature of [Writ ][of ][Mandamus ][declaring ][the ][illegal action ][of ][the ][res]giving any protection from [threat of ][illegal dispossession ][or ][encroachment ][to ][the]land measuring [Ac. ][9.80 cents, which was allotted under ][Sec' ][8 ][(h) ][of ][R'O'F' ][Act']2006 is illegal, [arbitrary and violation ][of ][provisions ][of ][R'O'F'R ][Act' Article ][14' ][19]and2lolthelndianConstitutionandconsequentlydirecttherespondentstogiveprotection and allow him [to ][enjoy ][the ][land ][measuring ][Ac ][9'80 ][cents ][from ][the]threat of dispossession [or encroachment']
l.A.NO:2 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 5465 OF 20121
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to giveprotection from the threat of dispossession and encroachments from otherpersons or authorities in connection with the Ac. 9.80 cents in Kesupally BeatCompartment No. 34 of Julurapadu Mandal, Khammam District pending disposalof the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.ANJI REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.S : Gp FOR HOME
The Court made the following ORDER
t\
THE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE K.SARATH]WRIT PETITION[No.][ 4320 of ][2OL2]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the [matter ][is ][taken ][up ][for ][hearing' ][it ][is]
informedthatthelearnedcounselappearingfortheon record [expired' ][In ][view ][of ][the ][same' ][this ][court]petitioner directed the [Registry ][to ][issue notice ][to ][the ][petitioner ][on]15.10.2024 and [the ][said ][notices ][were ][served ][to ][the]and [the ][matter ][was ][listed ][on ][17'12'2024' ][In]petitioner spite of service [of ][notice, none ][appeared ][on ][behalf ][of ][the]petitioner and the [matter ][js ][directed ][to ][be listed ][today]under the caption ["For Dismissal"']
2. Even [today, ][in ][spite ][of ][listing ][the ][name ][of ][the]in cause [list, ][none ][appeared ][on ][behalf ][of ][the]petitioner petitioner. It seems [that ][the ][petitioner ][is not ][interested ][to]prosecute this [case.]
In view of view of of [[the ][above ][circumstances, ]][[above ][circumstances, ]][[circumstances, ]][[the ][Writ ][Petition]][[Writ ][Petition]][[Petition]]
3. In view of view of of [[the ][above ][circumstances, ]][[above ][circumstances, ]][[circumstances, ]][[the ][Writ ][Petition]][[Writ ][Petition]][[Petition]]is dismissed [for Non-prosecution' ][There ][shall be ][no ][order]as to costs It 4Pending miscellaneous applications, if aly in thispetition, shall stand closed.petition, shall stand closed.
SD/-A. SRINIVASA REDDYASSIq-A\NT REGISTRARt,_\6EtnoNt\ - OFFlCER
//TRUE COPYII
To1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana atHyderabad. [OUT]2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana atHyderabad. [OUT]
[OUT]3. One CC to SRI K.ANJI REDDY, Advocate tOpUCI4. Two CD Copies fr SABS
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212024
ORDERWP.No.4320 of 2012
DISMISSING THE W.PFOR NON PROSECUTION-
WITHOUT COSTS.?+at +L1-\
1 r'E [S ][i.q;]6(,):)0 r rl, 2625 f,z**?' . [. ][,+,o]"' [.. ][.: ]-a-.