Telangana High Court
CRLP/2081/2009 of Madhusudhan Reddy Vs Yeddandi Rani on 30 December 2010
COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE THIRTYETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2081 OF 2009. Between: Madhusudhan Reddy … Petitioner V/s. Smt.Yeddandi Rani & 3-Ors. … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY THE THIRTYETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGOCRIMINAL PETITION No.2081 OF 2009.Between:Madhusudhan Reddy … PetitionerV/s.Smt.Yeddandi Rani & 3-Ors. … RespondentsCounsel for the Petitioner : Sri S. Prasad BabuCounsel for the Respondents1 to 3 : Sri Rajkumar Rudra Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Addl. Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order : (order follows 2[nd] page)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2081 OF 2009O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C.against the order dated 30-1-2009 passed in Crl.P.No. 41 of 2008 bythe III-Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC) Medakmodifying the order dated 029-2009 passed in MC.No.18 of 2007 bythe Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medak whereby andwhereunder the maintenance amount awarded by the learnedMagistrate is ordered to be paid from the date of order passed inMC.No.18 of 2007 instead of date of petition. Aggrieved thereby, thepresent criminal petition is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 andthe learned counsel for the petitioner called absent. Perused the oraland documentary evidence adduced by both parties and the orderimpugned.
3. Taking into consideration the contentions raised in thecriminal petition and also having taken into consideration the amountawarded by the trial court as well as the appellate court, this court isnot inclined to interfere with the order passed by both the courtsbelow, as the amount awarded by both the courts below is quite justand reasonable and it cannot be said to be exorbitant in these harddays of galloping double digit inflation. Accordingly, the same isconfirmed.
4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
______________________
JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
30-12-2010I s L
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2081 OF 2009
Circulation No. 25Date:30-12-2010Court Master: IsLComputer No.43