Telangana High Court

CC/1064/2023 of A. Ravinder Vs Dr. M. Manzoor Hussain on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1064 OF 2023 contempt case under Section 10 to 12 of conternpt of courts Act to sumrnon the respondents and

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF DECEIUBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1064 OF 2023

contempt case under Section 10 to 12 of conternpt of courts Act to sumrnonthe respondents and punish them for willful disobedience of the orders of thisHon'ble Court dated 2047 -2022 in t.A. No. 1 I 2022 in W.p. No. 29865.of 2022.

Eletween:

A Ravinder, S/o A.Sathaiah, aged about 52 years, Working as Record Assistaflt,O/o. JNTU College of Engineeiing, Kukatpafy, Hyderabadi

...PETITIONER

AND

l. Dr. M. Manzoor Hussain, Registrar, JNTU, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

2. Dr. SmL A..Jalqlakshmi, Principal, JNTU College of Engineering, Kukatpally,Ranga Reddy District-Ranga Reddy District-

... Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 1s1 cpc Rl/w. Rule, 18 of contempt of courts Actpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High iourt may be pleased to dispense with personal appearance ofPetitioner /1st respondent in cc No. 106412023 in the inlerest of justice and passPetitioner /1st respondent in cc No. 106412023 in the inlerest of justice and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petitbn under Section 1s1 cPc praying that in ttrc circumstances stated inthe affilavit llled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased todispense with personal appearanoe of 2nd respondent in cb No. 1064/2023 in theinterest of justice.

Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Rama Krishna for Sri P Raghavendra Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri B. Mayur reddy Sr. Counsel forSri Abdul euddus Mohd The Court made the following: ORDER

I

\

THE HOI{OURABLE SMT. JuSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVICONTEMPT CASE No.1O64 OF 20.23

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The Contempt Case is filed seeking punishment to the respondents under Section l0 to 12 of Conternpt of Court Act,for violation and wilful disobedience in implementation of theinterim order of this Court dated 2O.O7.2O22 passed, lnI.A.No. I of 2022 in W.P.No.29865 of 2022 and to pass suchother order or orders.

2. This Court, vide order dated 20.07.2022 passed lnW.P.No.29865 of 2022, granted interim suspension of therecovery proceedings dated 12.07.2021 and the said order wasextended from time to time. As the respondents issued letterdated O3.03.2023 vrolating the order of this Court, the presentContempt Case has been frled.

3. This Court while admitting Court while admitting while admitting admitting the contempt case, issuedcontempt case, issuedcase, issuedissuedform-I notice to the respondents on OL.12,2023 andaccordingly, the contemnors are present before this Courttoday.

This Court while admitting Court while admitting while admitting admitting the contempt case, issuedcontempt case, issuedcase, issuedissued

4. karned counsel appearing for contemnors submittedthat the internal letter dated 03.03.2023 was issued byrespondent No.l for recovery since he did not have knowledge ,t about [the ][interim ][order dated ][2O.O7.2O22 ][granted ][by ][this]Court [in ][W.P.No.29865 of ][2022. ][It ][is ][further ][submitted ][that ][as]soon [as ][the ][respondents came ][to ][know about ][the ][said ][order,]they [kept ][the ][letter ][dated ][03.O3.2023 ][in ][abeyance ][and ][also]assured [that ][no ][recovery ][would ][be ][made ][till ][the disposal ][of ][the]main [writ ]Petition'

S. [parned ][counsel ][for the petitioner ][also ][confirmed ][that ][no]recovery [was ][made ][from ][the ][petitioner's ][account ][till ][date.]

6. In view [of the ][submissions ][of ]both the [parties,]the contemnors that noparticularly the undertaking [given ][by ]recovery would [be ][made ]till [the ][disposal ]of the writ petition,the Contempt [Case ][is ][closed. ][There ][shall ]be no order as tocosts.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

SO/.I. NAGA LAKSHMIDEPUW REGISTRAR////TRUE COPYIIq/SECTION OFFICERTo,1. One CC to Sri P Raghavendra Reddy, Advocate {OPUCI2. One CC to Sri Abdul Quddus Mohd, Advocate [OPUC]3. Two CD CopiesKulKMSts HIGH COURT

TMD, J

DATED: 2911212023

I

ORDER

GC.No.1064 of 2023

CLOSING

THE CONTEMPT CASE

d

6c*'W

o,4t'i [zs ][rLB ][zt?-r].;9oEspt.iC'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead