Telangana High Court
WP/14804/2020 of M/s. Hyderabad Rock Sand Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT) on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: '14804 OF 2O2O Between:
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWOTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: '14804 OF 2O2O
Between:
M/s. Hyderabad Rock Sand, Sy.No.14, Sultanpur (V), Patancheru, Mandal,Telangana - 502319, represented by its Proprietor C.Satyanarayana ReddyS/o.C.Sitaram Reddy, aged about 63 years, residing at Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Secundrabad Division.
2. Assistant Commissioner (CT), Audit, Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad.
3. Commercial Tax Officer, Sangareddy, Nrzamabad Division.4. State ofTelangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ ofmandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No. 21863 dated 31/03/20'18passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequently the impugned ADC OrderNo.988 dated 2810512020 passed by the Respondent No.1 as being void, illegal,violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia,totally without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceed ngs and consequential actions [pursuant ]to the ADC OrderNo.9B8 dated 2Bl0! 12020 passed by the Respondent No.1 [.]
Counsel for the Pe ritioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK
Counsel for the Re;pondents: SRI K.RAJI REDDY FOR GP FifR COMMERCIAL TAXThe Court made th r following: ORDER
I
/
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAI BHIryAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BTIASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 14804 of 2O2O
ORDER: Per the Honble rhe Chief Justice Ujjol Bhugan)
Heard Mr. M.NagaDeepak, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Mr. K.RajiReddy, learned counsel for therespondents.
2. l,earned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuantto One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by theGovernment of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax disputewith the State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw thewrit petition.
3. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed onn,ithdrawal.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall standclosed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR [RAO]ASSISTANT REGISTRAR@SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To1One CC to SRI M.NAGA [DEEPAK, ][Advocate ][OPUC]IOne CC to SRI K RAJI [REDDY, ][Advocate ][OPUC]Two CD CopiesPSK.BSB9
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:30,1212022
ORDERWP.No.14804 ot 2020
DlSMlSSlN,i OF THE WRIT PETITIONON WITHDITAWAL WITHOUT COSTS.
L{ieew-//t l'L!,,-rr \' '
/:irI,'31 [JIN ][?s8]-b
\\