Telangana High Court
WP/27002/2005 of Mittapally Sailo, Vs Srinivas Reddy, on 26 December 2005
MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K .C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 27002 OF 2005 Dated 26-12-2005 Between : Mittapally Sailo, Sailoo, resident of Indal Wai (Village), Dichpally (Mandakl), Nizamabad District. PETITIONER. AND : 1. Srinivas Reddy, Sub-Inspector of Police,
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
&THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K .C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 27002 OF 2005
Between :
Dated 26-12-2005
Mittapally Sailo, Sailoo, resident of Indal Wai (Village), Dichpally (Mandakl),Nizamabad District.
PETITIONER.
AND :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Srinivas Reddy, Sub-Inspector of Police, Dichpally Police Station, NizamabadDistrict and others.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER : (Per the Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari)
This is a taken up writ petition on the Fax Message dated 13-12-2005 sent by thepetitioner seeking a direction to call for records and remarks from the respondents inconnection with attempting to occupy one acre of land by one K. Narshimlu from thepetitioner’s ancestral property admeasuring Ac.3.9 guntas situated in Sy.No.159 inIndialwai village which resulted in filing a civil suit and for illegal interference by theSub-Inspector of Police, Dichpally Police Station, viz. Srinivas Reddy instigated byone Bairy Nandipi Gangaram with the petitioner’s property, by calling the petitionerto the police station, abusing, beating and detaining him for two days andthreatening him to withdraw the civil suit, otherwise he will be involved in falsecases.
The 1st respondent has filed the counter denying the allegations in the FaxMessage. It is contended in the counter that on the complaint given by one Mr. BairyGangadhar, son of Nadipi Gangaram, resident of Indalvai village and on the information given by the Mandal Revenue Officer that regard to the land in question,a civil dispute is pending before the Court at Nizamabad, he advised thecomplainant orally and asked him to settle the issue before a competent court of law.In that view of the matter, no case is registered against him.
It is submitted across the Bar by the learned Advocate General that in view ofthe dispute in question which is civil in nature, the question of illegal detention doesnot arise.
In view of the submission made by the learned Advocate General and in viewof the averments made in the counter to the effect that in view of the dispute which iscivil in nature, he advised the complaint to settle the same before a competent Courtof law, We are of the view that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition.
In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
_____________________
Justice T.MEENA KUMARI
_____________________
Justice K.C.BHANU
Date : 26-12-2005.
Dvs/Gurc
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
&THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K .C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 27002 OF 2005
(Order delivered by the Honourable Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari)
Dated 26-12-2005