Telangana High Court
CRLP/11799/2022 of Mohd Liyakath Ali Vs The State of Telangana and another on 29 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF T€LAI{G"AITA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11799 OF 2022 Between: l\/ohd. Livakath Ali, Sio Mohd Anwar @ BC Anwar, Aged about 39 years, Occ:
j
IN THE HIGH [COURT ][FOR ][THE STATE OF T€LAI{G"AITA]AT HYDERABADTHURSDAY, THE TWENTY [NINTH ][DAY ][OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENry ][TWO]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE K.SURENDER]
CRIMINAL [P]ETITION[ N][O: ][11799 ][OF 2022]
Between:
l\/ohd. Livakath Ali, Sio Mohd [Anwar ]@ [BC ][Anwar, Aged about ][39 ][years, ][Occ:]i;;'6";i;;i;;. ilo. tlo [5, ][2nd ][crossl2nd ][Main, Pilanna Gardens, Bangalore]- 560 045
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
l.TheStateofTelangana,throughPSMeerpet,rep.byPublicProsecutor,HighCourt, HYderabad.Court, HYderabad.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
2. Sri Mohammed [Zaheer, S/o ][Md. ][Ameen, ][Age ][4-B ][years' Occ' ][DCM ][Driver]-' c* tj*n"t, nlo.ff . fqj. e--9-g/2, Drthu Nalar officers Colony' Saroor Nagar'R.R. Dist.-' c* tj*n"t, nlo.ff . fqj. e--9-g/2, Drthu Nalar officers Colony' Saroor Nagar'R.R. Dist.
, ..RESPONDENT/DEFACTO [COMPLAINANT]
PetitionunderSection4B2ofCr.P.CprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmay'be;i;il io- qur.n the [C.C.No. ][4065t2022 ][on ][the ][file ][of ][Hon'ble ][Vl ][Addl'][,f itr. Magistrate, [Ranga Reddy ][Dist ][, ][At ][Hasthinapuram' vide ][registered]Crir" "tr"p"f fl". 62ZliO21 [before PIS ][Meerpet, against ][the ][petitioner in the ][interest ][of]justice.
l.A. NO:1OF [2022]
PetitionunderSection4B2ofCr.P.Cprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the Memorandum [of ][Grounds ][of ][criminal ][Petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be]pi;;.il to stay all further [proceedings.tl:llging.the ][appearance ][of ][ac-cused]b.C.trto. 406512022 [on ][the ][file ][of ][Hon'bie ][Vl Addl. ][Metropolitan ][Magistrate, ][Ranga]neooyoist.'AtHasthinapuramvideFlRNo.622'ot2o21dated.23-08-2o21registlreO before [p.S ][Meerpet pending disposal ][of the ][main Criminal ][Petition ][in]the interest of [justice.]
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Meinorandum ofGrounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GADIPRAVEEN KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Assistant PublicProsecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for theRespondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDERCRIINAL PON No. L1799 0F 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.p.C') seeking to quash theCriminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.p.C') seeking to quash theproceedings in C.C.No.4065 of 2022 on the file of VI AdditionalMetropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hasthinapuram,for the offences punishable under Section 380 of Indian penalCode(for short'IPC').Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hasthinapuram,for the offences punishable under Section 380 of Indian penalCode(for short'IPC').
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused, learnedAssistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1 - State.Perused the record.
3. A perusal of the record would reveal that a case of theft ofgold ornament is registered against the petitioner. Learned counselfor the petitioner submits that all the alleged jewellery which wasidentified as jewellery subje* to theft, in fact belongs to thepetitioner. There are proofs to substantiate the claim. All theseaspects are subject matters of trial. For the aforesaid reason, this \
\
Court is not inclined to interfere with the proceedings in the trialCourt.
4. In the said circumstances, all the grounds raised by thepetitioner and the fact that there being a delay in lodging complaintafter theft was found out can also be agitated during course of trialbefore the concerned Court.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-P.GOWRI SHANKARASSISTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//ChSECTION OFFICER
To,1.The Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, R.R.District at Hasthinapuram.2.The ll Metropolitan Magistrate, Rachakonda at L.B.Nagar, R.R.District.J.The Station House Officer, Meerpet Police Station, Rachakonda.4.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana atHyderabad. (OUT)5.One CC to Sri GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]6.Two CD Copies.Njbplpbl HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212022
ORDERCRLP.No.11799 of 2022
DISPOSING OF I-HE CRIMINAL PETITION.
0(A\.tt\,,2
1YI3Jor2 3 ,lAil [?t?3]