Telangana High Court
CRP/1278/2014 of M B S T Sai Vs V Phakeer Reddy on 30 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEil/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1278 OF 2014 Petition under Section 1 15 of CPC,aggrieved by the order dated. 02.04.2014 in
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEil/BERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1278 OF 2014
Petition under Section 1 15 of CPC,aggrieved by the order dated.02.04.2014 in E.P.No.205 of 2010 in O.S.No.'140 of 2009 on the file of the V AddlJunior Civil Judge, CCC, Hyderabad.
Between:
M B S T Sai, S/o Late Sri Ram lvlurthy, Occ:- Employee, C/o Singarani Coolories,Lakhadaki pool, Hyderabad.
...REVISION PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR
AND
V Phakeer Reddy, S/o Late V N Reddy, Aged about 60 years, Occ;- Business,No D-1211122, Madhurangar, Ameerpet, Hyd.
.,RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER
CRPMP. NO: 1780 OF 2014:
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay all theproceedings including the operation of the order d1.O2.04.2O14 in E.P.No.205 of2010 in O.S.No.140 of 2009 on the file of the V Addl Junior Civil Judge, City CivilCourt, Hyderabad consequently direct the salary disbursing officer of thepetitioner not to deduct the salary of the petitioner till disposal of the appeal forabove said circumstances and reasons and the interest of Justice and [pass ]suchord er.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. BANDA PRASADA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE [A.VENKATESHWAII.A ][TTEDDY]cIVIL RI)VISION PETITION NO.1278 [OF]i,-Q1!l
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Civi Revision Petition is filed [assailing ][the ][orders]dated 02.04.2C14 in 8.P.No.205 of [2010 ][which ][vras ][filed ][for]attachments ol salary of [judgment ][debtor ][for ][reco',rery ][ol ][E.P.]amount of Rs.45,673/-. As [per ]the case [status ][infollnation, ][the]said Execution Petition was closed on [04.06.2014 itselL]
2. Theref rre, having regard to the said fact sinct. [n(r ][cause]survives, this Civil Revision Petition [is dismissed ][as ][inliu<;tuous.]In the circums.ances of the case, there shall [lrc ][no order ][as ][to]the costs. Mis cellaneous appiications, if [any ][pending, ][shall]stands closed.
Sd/. I. N,qGA LAKSHMI,T}E,PU'ry REGIST\I?AR^\\,U,1, ,i SECTION"OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The V Junic r Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. One CC to SRl. BANDA PRASADA RAO, Advocate [OI)UC]3. Two CD Co ries2. One CC to SRl. BANDA PRASADA RAO, Advocate [OI)UC]3. Two CD Co ries pr I
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212022
ORDERCRP.No.12i8 of 2014
DISMI S SING [(]RP ]AS INFRUCTUOUSofn\r \zt, rlq [sT4]h7i_)((Cc)2 0 FFB 2fl23"i'o.., [,./]\:,.rt \\,^\i--.,* .. ---'-