Telangana High Court
WP/25600/2007 of Venigalla Venkata Krishna Rao Vs The Land Acquisition officer cum District Collector on 24 December 2007
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 25600 of 2007 24.12.2007 Between: Venigalla Venkata Krishna Rao … Petitioner AND The Land Acquisition Officer-cum- District Collector, Guntur & others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao O R D E R: This
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 25600 of 2007
24.12.2007
Between:
Venigalla Venkata Krishna Rao
… Petitioner
AND
The Land Acquisition Officer-cum-District Collector, Guntur & others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:“ Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in thenature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1[st]respondent in issuing notification RC No. 3690/07-G2, dt.8.10.2007 in acquiring the petitioner’s land in Sy. No. 156 Part, anextent of Ac.0.16 cents and Sy.No. 157 Part to an extent ofAc.0.84 cents, total extent Ac.1.00 cts. Situated at DhonepudiVillage, Kollur Mandal, Guntur District, without publishing thesame in the newspapers as required under the Land AcquisitionAct interfering with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment ofthe land in question is illegal, void and opposed to Articles 14, 19,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently to directthe respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession andenjoyment of the petitioner’s lands in question without dueprocess of law.”
Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner requests that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition withliberty to file fresh one.
The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writpetition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayermade.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No. 33355of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed.
24.12.2007ksld
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J