Telangana High Court
WP/12631/2000 of Smt. K.Yaminidevi, Vs The Secretary of Government, on 30 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12631 of 2000 Between: Smt. K.Yaminidevi, W/o Venkatareddy, R/o Miryalaguda,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTPRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 12631 of 2000
Between:
Smt. K.Yaminidevi, W/o Venkatareddy,
R/o Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Secretary of Government, Legislative affairs & Justice Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The District Collector and District Magistrate, Nalgonda District.
3 Sri.G.Kurumulu,
Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly onein the nature of Writ of Certiorari callling for the records pertaining toG.O.Rt.No.887, dt:30-6-2000 Law (Law & J.Courts A.2) Department,appointing the 3rd Respondent as Add. Public prosecutor Miryalaguda,Nalgonda District by declaring the said G.O. as illegal, arbitrary andunconstitutional and also contrary to A.P., Law Offocer (Appointment andConditions of Services) Rules 1999 and consequently quash theG.O.Rt.No.887, dt:30-6-2000 issued by the 1st Respondent in the interest ofjustice Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESH
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following :
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY
W.P.No. 12631 of 2000
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition hasbecome infructuous.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J
30.12.2008Stp
To1.2CCs to2.2CD copies
Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSKM}
// TRUE COPY //
..... REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER