Telangana High Court

WP/12631/2000 of Smt. K.Yaminidevi, Vs The Secretary of Government, on 30 December 2008

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12631 of 2000 Between: Smt. K.Yaminidevi, W/o Venkatareddy, R/o Miryalaguda,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTPRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 12631 of 2000

Between:

Smt. K.Yaminidevi, W/o Venkatareddy,

R/o Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District.

AND

..... PETITIONER

1 The Secretary of Government, Legislative affairs & Justice Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 The District Collector and District Magistrate, Nalgonda District.

3 Sri.G.Kurumulu,

Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly onein the nature of Writ of Certiorari callling for the records pertaining toG.O.Rt.No.887, dt:30-6-2000 Law (Law & J.Courts A.2) Department,appointing the 3rd Respondent as Add. Public prosecutor Miryalaguda,Nalgonda District by declaring the said G.O. as illegal, arbitrary andunconstitutional and also contrary to A.P., Law Offocer (Appointment andConditions of Services) Rules 1999 and consequently quash theG.O.Rt.No.887, dt:30-6-2000 issued by the 1st Respondent in the interest ofjustice Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESH

Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following :

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY

W.P.No. 12631 of 2000

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition hasbecome infructuous.

Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

____________________

L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J

30.12.2008Stp

To1.2CCs to2.2CD copies

Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSKM}

// TRUE COPY //

..... REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead