Telangana High Court
WP/27665/2005 of G.Narasingamma Vs The Depot Manager, APSRTC on 28 December 2005
MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 27665 of 2005 Dated 28-12-2005 Between: G.Narasingamma W/o. G.Narayana Bapanpalli, Damargidda Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Depot Manager, APSRTC Narayanpet, Mahabubnagar District and another .....RESPONDENTS THE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 27665 of 2005
Dated 28-12-2005
Between: G.Narasingamma W/o. G.Narayana Bapanpalli, Damargidda Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
..... PETITIONERAND1 The Depot Manager, APSRTC Narayanpet, Mahabubnagar District andanother.....RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO. 27665 of 2005
The husband of the petitioner was employed as a Driver in the Narayanpet Depot ofA.P.S.R.T.C. He is said to have died on 07-05-2004, while in service. Petitioner approached the respondents, with a requestto provide alternative employment to her, stating that she has a large family tomaintain. Her grievance is that no action has been taken thereon.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for therespondents.
The Corporation formulated a Scheme, for providing employment to the dependentsof the deceased employees, in case their families were found to be in penuriouscondition, on the death of the employee. The question as to whether the petitioner isentitled to be extended the benefit of compassionate appointment, needs to beconsidered by the respondents. The application of the petitioner cannot be keptpending indifenitely.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to pass appropriateorders on the representation dated 25-10-2005, filed by the petitioner, within aperiod of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall beno order as to costs.
Dt.28-12-2005
Note:c.c in three days.
(B/O) KO
_______________________
L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.