Telangana High Court
WP/27633/2005 of Kanchi Vijayalaxmi, Vs The Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, on 30 December 2005
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.27633 OF 2005 Date:30.12.2005 BETWEEN: Kanchi Vijayalaxmi …. PETITIONER Vs. 1. The Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, Vijayawada,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI
AND
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION No.27633 OF 2005
Date:30.12.2005
BETWEEN:
Kanchi Vijayalaxmi
…. PETITIONER
Vs.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, Vijayawada, KrishnaDistrict, and others.District, and others.
….RESPONDENTS
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI
AND
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION No.27633 OF 2005
ORAL ORDER: (per TMK,J.)
This writ petition is taken up on the basis of telegrams dated 21.12.2005 and23.12.2005 sent by the petitioner, for issuance of writ of Habeas Corpusdirecting the respondents to produce the petitioner’s husband, namely, Kanchi Mallikarjuna Reddy, S/o. Ramireddy, before this Court, who is illegally takenaway by the Police Personnel of I Town Police, Vijayawada, Kirshna District on17.12.2005.
The respondents filed counter affidavit denying the allegations stating that thedetenu is accused in Cr.No.299 of 2005 under Sections 307, 384, 420, 386 IPCread with Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Hence, on 21.12.2005, the detenu wassummoned to the Police Station over telephone. Accordingly, the detenu alongwith his cousin P. Bhaskar Reddy came to the Police Station on 22.12.2005.After completing enquiry, and after examining the evidence of witnesses, it isrevealed that the case of the complainant is false. Immediately the detenu waslet off after obtaining an undertaking from his cousin that he would produce thedetenu as and when required. Accordingly, the detenu and his cousin left thePolice Station on 22.12.2005.
In view of the averments made in the counter affidavit, no further orders arenecessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at theadmission stage.
(T. MEENA KUMARI, J.)
________________________
_________________
(K.C. BHANU, J.)
30[th ]December, 2005Js.