Telangana High Court
WP/33644/2010 of Kakara Krishna Vs The District Collector on 31 December 2010
MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.33644 of 2010 DT.31.12.2010 Between: Kakara Krishna … Petitioner And The District Collector, East Godavari District and another … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya Counsel for respondents: AGP for Fisheries
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Writ Petition No.33644 of 2010
DT.31.12.2010
Between:
Kakara Krishna
And
… Petitioner
The District Collector, East Godavari District and another Counsel for the Petitioners:Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya … Respondents Counsel for respondents: AGP for Fisheries The Court made the following ORDER:
ORDER:
The subject matter of the writ petition pertains to revival of VeldurthyFishermen Cooperative Society. A perusal of the records shows that proceedingsin this regard were initiated and on 20.10.2010, respondent No.2 called upon boththe groups, which are locking horns with each other, to appear before the formeron 25.10.2010 along with the supporting documents. On 25.10.2010, the group ledby the petitioner attended the meeting and submitted a list of 26 members,whereas Sri Kakara China Raghava, heading the rival group, has not submitted hislist of members nor given any reply. Therefore, respondent No.2 has issuedproceedings in Ref.No.295/A1/2010, dated 04.11.2010, wherein the above factswere noted and it was concluded that Kakara China Raghava is not interested insubmitting his list of members. Respondent No.2 has observed that furthernecessary action will be initiated.
The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the said proceedings ofrespondent No.2, no further steps have been taken for revival of the society andthat his representation, dated 15.11.2010, made for this purpose has not beenconsidered by respondent No.2.
In view of the above-noted facts, the writ petition is disposed of with adirection to respondent No.2 to take appropriate steps as envisaged by him inproceedings, dated 04.11.2010, for revival of Veldurthy Fishermen CooperativeSociety and complete the process, within a period of one month from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order.
As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.42641 of 2010 filedby the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous.
Date:31.12.2010Note: Issue CC in ten days. (b/o) VGB
(C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J)