Telangana High Court
WP/47265/2018 of K.Maddamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 December 2018
P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.47265 OF 2018 Date: 28.12.2018 Between: K.Maddamma w/o K.Adiseshulu, Aged about 61 years, r/o. 2-103-1, Stantanpuram village, Kurnool Mandal and district and two others. …..Petitioners and The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Revenue
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.47265 OF 2018
Date: 28.12.2018
Between:
K.Maddamma w/o K.Adiseshulu, Aged about 61 years, r/o. 2-103-1, Stantanpuram village, Kurnool Mandal and district and two others.
…..Petitioners
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur district and others.
…..Respondents
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.47265 OF 2018
Petitioners claim to be the owners of land to an extent of Ac.21.79 cents in Sy.Nos.356/1, 356/2 and 356/3 of Kallur village in Kurnool district. Petitioners allege that Tahsildar of Kallur Mandal and the authorities of A.P.State Wakf Board are threatening to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of subject property and to hand over the possession to Wakf Board without any authority. Petitioners seek declaration that respondents 2 and 3 cannot threaten to dispossess the petitioners from their lawful possession without issuing notice and without following due process of law. In other words, petitioners are claiming title to the property in issue and that claim of Wakf Board that the said property is Wakf property is illegal. If that being so, petitioners have an effective and efficacious remedy before the A.P. Wakf Tribunal constituted under Section 83 of the Wakf Act, 1995. As Wakf Board is headed by the Judicial Officer vested with all powers as available to the civil Court, Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. More so, there are disputed questions of fact which cannot be gone into in writ proceedings. Granting liberty to the petitioners to avail remedy as available under Section 83 of the Wakf Act, 1995, Writ Petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.
___________________________
JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.47265 OF 2018
Date: 28.12.2018