Telangana High Court

WP/4792/2015 of J. Raghupathy, Vs C. Manohar Reddy, on 29 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND WRIT PETITION NO:4792 OF 2015 Between: AND 1 . C. Manohar Reddy, S/o. Goverdhan Reddy, Aged

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAOAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

WRIT PETITION NO:4792 OF 2015

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. J. Raghupathy, S/o. Saamya, Age4 27 years, NSS, Rl/o. VillageSalaravalapalli, Kandukur (M), R.R. District.Salaravalapalli, Kandukur (M), R.R. District.

2. R. Venkatesh, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 26 years, NSS, Rt/o. Rapalli,Mancherial, Adilabad District.Mancherial, Adilabad District.

3. Pasula Vikas, S/o. Damaodar Reddy, Aged 25 years, Ryo. KalwakurthyVillage & Mandal, Mahaboob nagar District.Village & Mandal, Mahaboob nagar District.

4. Baddipaduga Satyam, S/o. Yella Reddy, Aged 26 years, Rl/o. KudanpalliVillage, Husnabad (M), Karimnaar District.Village, Husnabad (M), Karimnaar District.

...PETITIONERS/

LEAVE PETITIONERS

AND

1 . C. Manohar Reddy, S/o. Goverdhan Reddy, Aged about 32 years, R/o. No. 1-30, Daspally Village, Telkapally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District-509 385.30, Daspally Village, Telkapally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District-509 385.

2. E. Shiva Kumar, S/o. Bhoomaiah, Aged about 30 Years, Rl/o. No. 3-75,Angadi Bazar, Village / Mandal, Luxettipet, Adilabad District-so4 21 5.Angadi Bazar, Village / Mandal, Luxettipet, Adilabad District-so4 21 5.

3. Ch. Madhukar, S/o. Thirupathi, Aged about 28 years, Rl/o. No. 2-52, YillageRajannapet, Mandal Yellareddypet, District Karimnagar-505 305.Rajannapet, Mandal Yellareddypet, District Karimnagar-505 305.

....RESPONDENTS/APPLICANTS IN O.A

4. The Union of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Statistics & Programmelmplementation, NSSO (FOD), R.K. Puram, New Delhi.lmplementation, NSSO (FOD), R.K. Puram, New Delhi.

5. The Deputy Director General,, Ministry of Statistics & Programmelmplementation, NSSO (FOD), Zonal Office, Kendriya Sadan, Koramangala,Bangalore-560 034.lmplementation, NSSO (FOD), Zonal Office, Kendriya Sadan, Koramangala,Bangalore-560 034.

6The Deputy Director General, Ministry of Statistics & Programmelmplementation, NSSO [(FOD), ]Regional Office, Andhra [Pradesh ][(North)]Region, No. 29317,151 Floor, R&B Complex, AC [Guards, ][Mahaveer ][Marg,]Hyderabad-500 004.

.RESPONDENTS/

RESPONDENTS IN O.A

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus underArticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia declaring the order [passed ]by the Hon'bleCentral Administrat ve Tribunal in OA no. 80712014 daled 17-O7-2O14 are notonly erroneous, but also without [jurisdiction ]apart from contrary to the Section 24of the Administrativc Tribunal Act. 1985 and set aside the same.

l.A. NO: 2 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 6362 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]tosuspend the operat on of orders daled 17-O7-2014 in OA No. 807/2014 [passed]by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI.P.V.KRISHNAIAH

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l to 3: SRI.M.VENKAT RAM REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : SRI.G.PRAVEEN KUMAR

The Court made the following ORDER

III

!i

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAOANDHON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

WRIT PETITION No.4792 OF 2015

ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Si Justice P.Naueen Rao)

Thc learned counsel for the petitioners represents thatthe cause in the writ petition doe s not survive.Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed. NoCO S tS.Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed SD/-K.VENKAIAHASSISTANT [RE]TRAR/iTRUE COPY//\/- SECTIONFFICER

To1One CC to [SRI P.V.KRISHNAIAH, Advocate ][TOPUC]-^- ].-25;; ca io [5nr.r',1 ][velxnT ][RAM REDDY, ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]3Two CD Copies4One spare [coPY]SA.S \\' Y

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911212022

ORDERWP.No.4792 of 2015

DISMISSING THE W.PWITHOUT COSTS.

5[c{k6]trtr

1f'['i; ][SF][4h](),{'to2 4 [JAtl ][?023]..n(*/./\i: [''! ]at'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead