Telangana High Court
WP/4792/2015 of J. Raghupathy, Vs C. Manohar Reddy, on 29 December 2022
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND WRIT PETITION NO:4792 OF 2015 Between: AND 1 . C. Manohar Reddy, S/o. Goverdhan Reddy, Aged
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAOAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:4792 OF 2015
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. J. Raghupathy, S/o. Saamya, Age4 27 years, NSS, Rl/o. VillageSalaravalapalli, Kandukur (M), R.R. District.Salaravalapalli, Kandukur (M), R.R. District.
2. R. Venkatesh, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 26 years, NSS, Rt/o. Rapalli,Mancherial, Adilabad District.Mancherial, Adilabad District.
3. Pasula Vikas, S/o. Damaodar Reddy, Aged 25 years, Ryo. KalwakurthyVillage & Mandal, Mahaboob nagar District.Village & Mandal, Mahaboob nagar District.
4. Baddipaduga Satyam, S/o. Yella Reddy, Aged 26 years, Rl/o. KudanpalliVillage, Husnabad (M), Karimnaar District.Village, Husnabad (M), Karimnaar District.
...PETITIONERS/
LEAVE PETITIONERS
AND
1 . C. Manohar Reddy, S/o. Goverdhan Reddy, Aged about 32 years, R/o. No. 1-30, Daspally Village, Telkapally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District-509 385.30, Daspally Village, Telkapally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District-509 385.
2. E. Shiva Kumar, S/o. Bhoomaiah, Aged about 30 Years, Rl/o. No. 3-75,Angadi Bazar, Village / Mandal, Luxettipet, Adilabad District-so4 21 5.Angadi Bazar, Village / Mandal, Luxettipet, Adilabad District-so4 21 5.
3. Ch. Madhukar, S/o. Thirupathi, Aged about 28 years, Rl/o. No. 2-52, YillageRajannapet, Mandal Yellareddypet, District Karimnagar-505 305.Rajannapet, Mandal Yellareddypet, District Karimnagar-505 305.
....RESPONDENTS/APPLICANTS IN O.A
4. The Union of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Statistics & Programmelmplementation, NSSO (FOD), R.K. Puram, New Delhi.lmplementation, NSSO (FOD), R.K. Puram, New Delhi.
5. The Deputy Director General,, Ministry of Statistics & Programmelmplementation, NSSO (FOD), Zonal Office, Kendriya Sadan, Koramangala,Bangalore-560 034.lmplementation, NSSO (FOD), Zonal Office, Kendriya Sadan, Koramangala,Bangalore-560 034.
6The Deputy Director General, Ministry of Statistics & Programmelmplementation, NSSO [(FOD), ]Regional Office, Andhra [Pradesh ][(North)]Region, No. 29317,151 Floor, R&B Complex, AC [Guards, ][Mahaveer ][Marg,]Hyderabad-500 004.
.RESPONDENTS/
RESPONDENTS IN O.A
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus underArticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia declaring the order [passed ]by the Hon'bleCentral Administrat ve Tribunal in OA no. 80712014 daled 17-O7-2O14 are notonly erroneous, but also without [jurisdiction ]apart from contrary to the Section 24of the Administrativc Tribunal Act. 1985 and set aside the same.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 6362 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]tosuspend the operat on of orders daled 17-O7-2014 in OA No. 807/2014 [passed]by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI.P.V.KRISHNAIAH
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l to 3: SRI.M.VENKAT RAM REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : SRI.G.PRAVEEN KUMAR
The Court made the following ORDER
III
!i
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAOANDHON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.4792 OF 2015
ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Si Justice P.Naueen Rao)
Thc learned counsel for the petitioners represents thatthe cause in the writ petition doe s not survive.Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed. NoCO S tS.Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed SD/-K.VENKAIAHASSISTANT [RE]TRAR/iTRUE COPY//\/- SECTIONFFICER
Conclusion
To1One CC to [SRI P.V.KRISHNAIAH, Advocate ][TOPUC]-^- ].-25;; ca io [5nr.r',1 ][velxnT ][RAM REDDY, ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]3Two CD Copies4One spare [coPY]SA.S \\' Y
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212022
ORDERWP.No.4792 of 2015
DISMISSING THE W.PWITHOUT COSTS.
5[c{k6]trtr
1f'['i; ][SF][4h](),{'to2 4 [JAtl ][?023]..n(*/./\i: [''! ]at'