Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/44280/2013 of CHHINDER KAUR AND ANR. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 30 December 2013
of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 44280 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 30, 2013. Chhinder Kaur and another ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 44280 of 2013(O&M)Date of Decision: December 30, 2013.
Chhinder Kaur and another
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present:Petitioners in person with Mr. A.K.Handa,Advocate, for the petitioners.
*****
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners willbe satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka i.e. respondent No.2is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on applicationdated 28.12.2013 (Annexure P-4), made to him by the petitioners.
As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners aremajor. Date of birth of petitioner No.1-Chhinder Kaur, as per copy of VoterIdentity Card issued by Government of India, Annexure P-1, is 01.01.1992and age of petitioner No.2 –Baldev Singh as per copy of Voter Identity Cardissued by Government of India, Annexure P-2, is 22 years as on 01.01.2006.
They got married on 28.12.2013 as per averments made in the petition.Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P-3.
In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for thepetitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by thepetitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction torespondent No.2 - i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka to takeappropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 28.12.2013(Annexure P-4) as already stated to have been moved to him by thepetitioners.
However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effecton the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil orcriminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law.
December 30, 2013.‘om’
( RAM CHAND GUPTA )JUDGE