Telangana High Court
CRLP/17221/2016 of Vadlamudi Thirumala Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 December 2016
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [Special Original Jurisdiction] THURSDAY THE TWENTYNINETH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016 PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17221 OF 2016 Between: Vadlamudi Thirumala Rao
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
[Special Original Jurisdiction]
THURSDAY THE TWENTYNINETH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17221 OF 2016Between: Vadlamudi Thirumala Rao … Petitioner/Accused V/s. The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana & Andhra Pradesh, Through Station House Officer, Singarayakonda Police Station, Prakasam district. … Respondent/complainant Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Kurava Naganna Counsel for the Respondent: Additional Public Prosecutor The court made the following: [order follows]
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17221 OF 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under section 437 and 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge him on bail in Crime No. 125 of 2016 of Singarayakonda Police Station, Prakasam district, registered for the offences punishable under section 376 of IPC section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 3 [1] [r] [s] [w], section 3 [2] [v] [Va] of SCs and STs [POA] Act, 1989.
2. For the same relief, the petitioner earlier filed bail application vide Criminal Petition No. 16285 of 2016 and the same was dismissed vide order dated 25/11/2016.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that after dismissal of the first bail application, thereafter, charge sheet was filed on 14/12/2016.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the said petition with liberty to approach the trial court.
5. Permission is accorded with liberty as prayed for.
6. The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed, as withdrawn.
7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
_____________________________________
JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT.
29/12/2016I s L
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17221 OF 2016
Date: 29/12/2016 Circulation No. Court Master: I s L