Telangana High Court
WP/12341/2011 of Jeevan Jyothi High School Vs The Tahsildar, Balanagar Mandal, on 30 December 2015
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 12341 OF 2011 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With the consent of both parties, the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. The present Writ Petition came to be filed
WRIT PETITION No. 12341 OF 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned GovernmentPleader for Revenue. With the consent of both parties, the present writpetition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.
The present Writ Petition came to be filed seeking to declare theaction of the first respondent in attempting to demolish the structures andforcibly dispossessing the petitioner from Jeevan Jyothi High Schoolpremises in a total extent of 1050 square yards covered byplot Nos.120-123, 136-138 in Survey Nos.328 to 332 ofKukatpally village and municipality, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict presently known as Tulasinagar, Phase-II, Allwyn Colony,Kukatpally, as illegal and arbitrary.
On 26.04.2011, this Court, while issuing notice before admission,granted status quo to be maintained for a period of six weeks. On15.06.2011, the order of status quo was extended for a further period ofeight weeks therefrom. Subsequently, there was no extension of theinterim order.
A counter affidavit came to be filed by the first respondent statingthat they have interfered with the land in dispute, but, however, they havenot encroached on to the land of the petitioner and have not demolished thestructures of the School.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case if any actionis to be initiated against the petitioner, the respondents may be directed todo the same with due process of law.
Recording the contents of the counter and without going into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents, to followthe due process of law, in case if any encroachments are made by thepetitioner. No costs.
Consequently, the Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writpetition shall stand closed.
_________________________
JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
30.12.2015vhb