Telangana High Court
WP/602/2003 of Union of India Vs A.P. State Financial Corporation and 3 Others on 30 December 2019
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) N4ONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A . ABHISHEK REDDY AND 1 2 3 4 Union of lndia, represented by the
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
N4ONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHANANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 602 OF 2003
Between:
Union of lndia, represented by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs,Hyderabad-lV Comm issio nerate, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1A.P. State Financial Corporation, represented by its Assistant General Manager, RangeReddy East Branch, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad.Reddy East Branch, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad.2State Bank of lndia, represented by its lt/anager, Charminar Branch, Charminar,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.3M/s. Vijaya Silk IVills, represented by its Partner Sri Kailashnath Gupta, H.No. 21-7-269,Mittikasher, Charkaman, Hyderabad.Mittikasher, Charkaman, Hyderabad.4M/s Archid Ply Wood Limited, Represented by its managing Director, Mr. Ramesh KumarDhir, 5-9-82/60/A (New No.257) Adarshnagar, Hyderabad - 63.(R4 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 06.07.2007 ln WPTVP *o ,on1]*oJ.?%9_lJ=rr.Dhir, 5-9-82/60/A (New No.257) Adarshnagar, Hyderabad - 63.(R4 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 06.07.2007 ln WPTVP *o ,on1]*oJ.?%9_lJ=rr.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issuean order or direction, more in the nature of writ of [t/andamus, directing the 1st respondentcircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issuean order or direction, more in the nature of writ of [t/andamus, directing the 1st respondentnot to seize the properties of the 3rd respondent unit under Section 29 of the StateFinancial Corporations Act, 1951, Pursuant to its letter daled O31O112003 which are nowunder the possession of the petitioner in view of the confiscation order issued in favour ofUnion of lndia vide orders dated 2010611997 issued by the petitionerUnion of lndia vide orders dated 2010611997 issued by the petitioner WPMP. NO: 779 OF 2003
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1strespondent no to proceed further in pursuance of their letter dated 03.01 .2003 and seize theproperties of the 3'd respondent which are now under the petitioner's possession by virtue ofthe confiscation orders dated 29.06.1997, pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition.respondent no to proceed further in pursuance of their letter dated 03.01 .2003 and seize theproperties of the 3'd respondent which are now under the petitioner's possession by virtue ofthe confiscation orders dated 29.06.1997, pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition.
WVMP. NO: 823 OF 2003Between:
A.P. State Financial Corporation, represented by its Asslstant General I\,4anager,Range Reddy (East) Branch, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad.Range Reddy (East) Branch, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad.
..PETITIONER/ Respondent No.'lAND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of lndia, rep by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Hyderabad-lVCommissionerate, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.Commissionerate, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
2. State Bank of lndia, rep by its lvlanager, Charminar Branch, Charminar, Hyderabad.3. tV/s. Vijaya Silk lMills, represented by its Partner Sri Kailashnath Gupta, H.No. 21-7-269,Mittikasher, Charkaman, Hyderabad.3. tV/s. Vijaya Silk lMills, represented by its Partner Sri Kailashnath Gupta, H.No. 21-7-269,Mittikasher, Charkaman, Hyderabad.(Respondent Nos 2 and 3 not necessary
..RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Ilection 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed in suppcrt of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleitsed ]to vacate the interimorders dated 8th day,rf January, 2003 in WPMP NO. 779 of 2002 in W.P.No.602 of 2003on the fie of the Hon'b le Court Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI [N ]VIJAY
Counsel for Respondent No.4: SRI PRABHAKAR PERI
The Court made the following: ORDER
ORDER: {Per the Hon'ble the Chlet Just ce Sr Justice Raghvendra Singh chauhan}
Ms. Meghana Chakravarthy, Iearned counsel, representingMr. B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for the petitloner,seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any. shall standdismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1One CC to Sri B Narasimha [Sarma Advocate ][OPUC]2One CC to Sri Prabhakar [Peri ][Advocate ][OPUC]3One CC to Srl [N ][Viiay Advocate ][OPUC]4Two CD Copies\--- SD/- CH. VENKATESHWARASSISTANT REGI
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED: 3011212t419
ORDERWP.No.602 of ,2003
DISMISSING T1'{E WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRA\A/N, WITHOUT COSTS
5 [&!,->inz''])r1 it \--'"--"
l "1,iHE [s ][14]atl5 JUIJ 2921Lk.r,])rP!.