Telangana High Court
WP/22441/1995 of G.Vinod Kumar Vs Warangal Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., on 30 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR WRIT PETITION NO : 22441 of 1995 Between: G.Vinod Kumar S/o G.Bhadraiah, H.NO.8-11-128, JPN Road, Warangal,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWARWRIT PETITION NO : 22441 of 1995
Between:
G.Vinod Kumar S/o G.Bhadraiah,H.NO.8-11-128, JPN Road,Warangal,
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 Warangal Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., I Floor, Opp: Intejargunj Police Station, RNT Road, Warangal, rep. by its Chairman.2 The District Cooperative Officer, Warangal Dist. Warangal.
3 The Registrar for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, A.P. Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus declaring the notification issued by the 1st Respondent dt:11-8-1995 and published in Eenadu, Telugu daily, Warangal edition dtd 14-8-1995 for theposts of Accounts Officer without giving particulars regarding rule of reservation andlocal reservation in terms of 6 point formula and all other consequential proceedingsincluding the interviews held on 23-9-1995 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutionalapart from violative of principles of natural justice and also against the 6 pointformula.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NANDIGAM KRISHANA RAOCounsel for the Respondent No.1 : MR.Y.RAMA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: The G.P. for Cooperation
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Writ Petition hasbecome infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having becomeinfructuous, interim order, if any, stands vacated. No costs.
30-12-2004
Stp
--------------------
To
1 The Chairman,Warangal Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., I Floor, RNT Road,Warangal 2 The District Cooperative Officer, Warangal, Warangal Dist., 3 The Registrar for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies,Hydeabad A.P.,
4. 2CD copies
5 Two CCs to the G.P. for Cooperation, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ( OUT)