Telangana High Court
WP/27552/2007 of Smt. B. Laxmi Kalavathi, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, on 26 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA Writ Petition No.27552 of 2007 (DATED: 26-12-2007) Between: Smt.B.Laxmi Kalavathi W/o late B.Mahanandi Reddy Occ: Fair Price shop dealer, Shop No.133, Kalluru, Kurnool City. ….Petitioner A n d The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool District and others
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
Writ Petition No.27552 of 2007
(DATED: 26-12-2007)
Between:
Smt.B.Laxmi Kalavathi W/o late B.Mahanandi ReddyOcc: Fair Price shop dealer, Shop No.133, Kalluru,Kurnool City.
….Petitioner
A n d
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool District and others …Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies hadtaken notice on 24.12.2007.
2. Heard both the counsel.
3. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring theproceedings vide RC B 2084/2007 dated 6.12.2007 issued by the firstrespondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of A.P.State Public Distribution System Control Order and pass such othersuitable orders.
3. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition. It is stated that already an appeal had been preferredbefore the third respondent. It is needless to mention that the orderimpugned is only suspension pending enquiry. No doubt, the counselfor the petitioner had stated that the ground on which suspensionpending enquiry was ordered is totally an unsustainable ground. ThisCourt is not inclined to express any opinion on this aspect of the mattersince it is stated that an appeal had been preferred and the same ispending before the third respondent.
4. In view of the facts and circumstances, let the third respondentdispose of the appeal within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order. Status-quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained till disposal of the appeal by the third respondent.
4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly at the stage ofadmission. No costs.
26-12-2007RAR
__________________
P.S.NARAYANA, J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
Writ Petition No.27552 of 2007
(DATED : 26-12-2007)