Telangana High Court
WP/44717/2017 of M.K. VISWANATHAM Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 December 2017
SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.44717 of 2017 ORDER: Heard Mr.K.Venkatesh for petitioner and the Assistant Government Pleader (Tribal Welfare) for respondents. On 06.12.2017, the petitioner filed revision under Section 6 of the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation 1 of 1959
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.44717 of 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Mr.K.Venkatesh for petitioner and the Assistant Government Pleader (Tribal Welfare) for respondents.
On 06.12.2017, the petitioner filed revision under Section 6 of the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation 1 of 1959 against the order dated 14.11.2017 in C.M.A.No.112 of 2008, but the 1[st]respondent did not take up the application filed for stay or given a date for arguing the revision. While the matter stood thus, respondents 3 to 5 are forcibly evicting the petitioner.
According to Mr.Venktesh, if the petitioner is dispossessed pending consideration and disposal of revision, the petitioner will be put to loss and hardship. Hence, the writ petition.
The revision filed against order dated 14.11.2017 in C.M.A.No.112 of 2008 is pending before the 1[st] respondent. Therefore, if the petitioner is dispossessed pending revision, the petitioner suffers loss and hardship.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of by this order.
(a) The 1[st] respondent considers taking up application filed for stay and passes orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(b) The parties are directed to maintain status-quo as regards possession as on date till a decision is taken and communicated by the 1[st]respondent.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
No order as to costs.
_____________
S. V. BHATT, J
Dt: 29-12-2017 Prv
Prv
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.44717 of 2017
29-12-2017