Telangana High Court
CRLP/9313/2012 of Vishwanathula , Shivanathula Venkateshwarlu Vs The State of A.P., rep.by its P.P., on 31 December 2012
SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.9313 of 2012 ORDER:- The petitioner is A .1 in Cr.No.133 of 2012 of Metpalli Police Station, registered for the offence under Section 420 of I.P.C. The accusation made against the petitioner is that he along with other accused made the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDYCriminal Petition No.9313 of 2012
ORDER:-
The petitioner is A.1 in Cr.No.133 of 2012 of Metpalli PoliceStation, registered for the offence under Section 420 of I.P.C.
The accusation made against the petitioner is that he along withother accused made the complainant to part with an amount ofRs.2,00,000/- on the assurance that the cartons which they deliveredare relating to Santoor soaps, cigarette packets and shampoos. Butthe cartons, which the petitioner and others delivered to thecomplainant, found to be containing biscuits and thereby deceived thecomplainant.
Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it isthe complainant who has to be aware of its contents before takingdelivery of the cartons. It is further contended that as on this day, A.2and A.3 are on bail land therefore the petitioner deserves for grant ofanticipatory bail.
Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.The petitioner along with A.2 approached the II-AdditionalSessions Judge for grant of anticipatory bail by moving Crl.M.P.No.913of 2012. The said application came to be dismissed on 8-8-2012. Thename of the petitioner finds place in the First Information Report. Thecomplainant has specifically stated that it is the petitioner and twoothers who made him to part with an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- on theassurance that the cartons contain Santoor soaps, cigarette packetsand shampoos. When the cartons opened, they contained biscuits. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioner.
Accordingly, Criminal Petition is dismissed.
31[st] December, 2012Smr/gkv
________________________
B.Seshasayana Reddy, J