Telangana High Court

CRP/1558/2016 of SOMA HYDERABAD CITY CENTRE PVT. LTD, HYD Vs THE A.P.S.R.T.C., HYD on 31 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 1558 OF 2016 Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia, against the administrative

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR [THE STATE OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY [OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. [JUSTICE ][CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA]

CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON [NO: ][1558 OF][ 2016]

Petition under Article 227 of [the ][constitution ][of ][lndia, ][against ][the]administrative Order dated.26.02.2016 [passed ][in Order ][No.950 transferring ][the ][suit]in o.s.No.494 ol 2012 from the [court ][of ][the ][lll ][Additional ][chief ][Judge to ][the ][court ][of]the ll Additional Chief Judge, [City Civil Court, ][Hyderabad']

Between:

Ivl/s Soma Hvderabad city centre [Private Limited, ][represented_by ][its ][Assistant]Generat Man'ager,Patri [Mddhav Rao, S/o. ][Sri. ][P. Pandu ][Ranga. ][Rao' age6 aboul]iiVeirs,14, [A"venue - ][4, Road ][No.10, ][Banjara Hills, Hyderabad']

...Petitioner/Plaintiff

AND

The Andhra Pradesh state [Road ][Transport corporation, represented by ][its ][Vice]Chairman and Managing [Director, ][Hyderabad.]

... Res pondenUDefe [ndant]

I,A, NO:2 OF [2]016(CRPMP. [N][O: ][1971][ OF][ 2016)]

Petition under Section [151 ][cPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed [therewith, ][the ][High ][court ][may be ][pleased ][grant ][stay ][of ][all ][further]proceedings in oS No.494 [of ][2012 ][on ][the file of the ][lll ][Additional ][chief ][Judge, ][city]CivilCourt,HyderbadpendingdisposaloftheCivilRevisionPetition.

Counsel for the [Petitioner: ][SRI M. ][A. K. ][MUKHEED]

--------Counsel for the [Respondent: ]The Court made the [following: ][ORDER]

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1558 OF 2016

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Mr. M.A.K. Mukeed, learned counsel for the petitioner,submits that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuousand, therefore, it may be dismissed.

Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition isdismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneousapplications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.

SD/.K.SAILESHIASSISTANT REGISTRARqe

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To

1. The Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.

2. The lll Additional Chief Judge, at Hyderabad.

3. One CC to SRI N4. A. K. I\4UKHEED, Advocale IOPUCI

4. Two CD Copies

5. The ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil [Court, ][Hyderabad.]6. One Spare Copy MMKTR \.p- HIGH [COURT]

DATEDi31l12l2O21

ORDERCRP.No.1558 of [2016]

-* [*h':r]./t^<n- ti,|::'2t [\u\][1t11]--i<

DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

*t[u0]\>t\+

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead